Understanding the Controversy: Is 0^0 Really Equal to 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathelord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical expression 0^0 and whether it equals 0. Participants debate the validity of equations leading to the conclusion that 0^0 equals 0, with some arguing that the reasoning is flawed due to the indeterminate nature of 0^0. They highlight that while certain limits suggest 0^0 can be defined as 1 for convenience, it is generally considered undefined. The conversation also touches on the properties of exponents, emphasizing that 0 raised to any power is 0, while any number raised to the power of 0 is 1. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards 0^0 being an indeterminate form rather than definitively equal to 0.
mathelord
a friend [no longer a user of the forum]showed me this and i felt i should as well show this to you all
let x^x=x
x^[1/x]=x
x^[1/x]-x=0
x[x^(1/x-1)-1]=x
so x is 0 and 1.
which evntually gives 0^0 as 0
in sloving with anither method,he also got -1 as x.
how true is the topic 0^0=0.
he explained that if you have nothing and you raise it to nothing you eventually get nothing.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathelord said:
...
x^[1/x]-x=0
x[x^(1/x-1)-1]=x
...
How did you get from the first step to the second ?
 
If you have x = 0, you get 1/0 which is invalid.
I also fail to see how you got from the first to the second equation.
 
I don't actually see how the first equation is valid , never mind the second one.

Could somebody please explain ?
 
It's valid because he wants to solve x^x = x, for x.
 
mathelord said:
a friend [no longer a user of the forum]showed me this and i felt i should as well show this to you all
let x^x=x
x^[1/x]=x
x^[1/x]-x=0
x[x^(1/x-1)-1]=x
so x is 0 and 1.
which evntually gives 0^0 as 0
in sloving with anither method,he also got -1 as x.
how true is the topic 0^0=0.
he explained that if you have nothing and you raise it to nothing you eventually get nothing.

mathelord, this is all pretty trivial. What is it that's confusing you? If you "have nothing and you raise it to nothing", then you don't have anything to exponentiate! You don't "eventually" get nothing, it was always nothing.
 
Last edited:
benjamincarson said:
mathelord, this is all pretty trivial...
Factoring x from 0 and getting x is some pretty nontrivial algebra. :smile:
 
hypermorphism said:
Factoring x from 0 and getting x is some pretty nontrivial algebra. :smile:
I don't see how he was "factoring x from 0 ". Anyway, It wouldn't be hard to construct a proof that shows that the equation x^{x}=x is only valid for 0 and 1. So...
0^{0}=0
1^{1}=1

Fiddle-dee-do
 
Well:

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} x^x = 1

\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} 0^x = 0

Some times 00 = 1 is defined as for usefulness, but in general its not determined.
 
  • #10
benjamincarson said:
I don't see how he was "factoring x from 0 "...
Look at his fourth step.
benjamincarson said:
It wouldn't be hard to construct a proof that shows that the equation LaTeX graphic is being generated. Reload this page in a moment. is only valid for 0 and 1...
It would be impossible. 00 is an indeterminate form. See here and here.
 
  • #11
x^0=1 any number raised to zeor power equals 1. x*x*x*x...*x zeor amount of times equals 1 because 1 is the null value in multiplication. a number times himself zero times is equal to 1.
0^x=0 zero raised to any power equals zero. 0*0*0*0*0*...0=0 because of multiplication property. no matter how many zeors you have...you still have zero.

0^0=? Well...is it 1 becasue it is raised to zeor parts? or is it 0 becasue the 0 is raised to a power? Can't be both, but it can be none. answer: undefined.
 
Back
Top