modzz said:
I really don't know..but if u can do it in general form that would be great.
Well, usually it is sufficient to find a counterexample to show that something does not hold in general.
because in your case you can think of it this way: let
[tex]c=\frac{x_1}{x_2}, b=\frac{y_1}{y_2}, x_1, x_2, y_1,y_2 \in Z^+[/tex] I am first working only with positive integers, but if u want to prove for any integer, then you have to work in cases.
Also, let [tex]gcd(x_1,x_2)=gcd(y_1,y_2)=1[/tex] Now,
[tex]c= a^b=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}}[/tex] Now we want to show that c is irrational. Let's suppose the contrary, suppose that c is rational so we can rewrite c as:
[tex]c=\frac{x_1}{x_2}, gcd(x_1,x_2)=1[/tex] This way:
[tex]\frac{x_1}{x_2}=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}}=>(\frac{x_1}{x_2})^{y_2}=a^{y_1}=>(x_1)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_2}[/tex] so we notice that
[tex](x_1)^{y_2}\in a^{y_1}Z[/tex] now we want to know what happenes with x_1.
Suppose that x_1 is not in [tex]a^{y_1}Z[/tex] So, this means that
[tex]x_1 \in m+ a^{y_1}Z[/tex] for [tex]m=1,2,...,a^{y_1}-1[/tex] Now let m =1, for our case, so
[tex]x_1=1+a^{y_1}=>(x_1)^{y_2}=(1+ka^{y_1})^{y_2}[/tex] we notice that when we expand the RHS all terms besides the first one will have an [tex]a^{y_1}[/tex] so we can factor this one out, which means that also
[tex](x_1)^{y_2} \in m+ a^{y_1}Z[/tex] which is not true, so the contradition derived means that
[tex]x_1\in a^{y_1}Z=>x_1=a^{y_1}k, k \in Z[/tex]
Now,
[tex](x_1)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_ 2}=>(a^{y_1}k)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_ 2}=>(x_2)^{y_2}=a^{y_1(y_2-1}}k^{y_2}[/tex]
By doing the same reasoning we come to the point where
[tex]x_1=a^rk_1,x_2=a^rk_2, =>gcd(x_1,x_2)=a^r[/tex] which contradicts the fact that [tex]gcd(x_1,x_2)=1[/tex] this way we have proved that
[tex]c= a^b=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}}[/tex]
cannot be rational.
Indeed it can be rational only if [tex]y_2|y_1=> y_1=ky_2, k \in Z[/tex]