modzz said:
I really don't know..but if u can do it in general form that would be great.
Well, usually it is sufficient to find a counterexample to show that something does not hold in general.
because in your case you can think of it this way: let
c=\frac{x_1}{x_2}, b=\frac{y_1}{y_2}, x_1, x_2, y_1,y_2 \in Z^+ I am first working only with positive integers, but if u want to prove for any integer, then you have to work in cases.
Also, let gcd(x_1,x_2)=gcd(y_1,y_2)=1 Now,
c= a^b=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}} Now we want to show that c is irrational. Let's suppose the contrary, suppose that c is rational so we can rewrite c as:
c=\frac{x_1}{x_2}, gcd(x_1,x_2)=1 This way:
\frac{x_1}{x_2}=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}}=>(\frac{x_1}{x_2})^{y_2}=a^{y_1}=>(x_1)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_2} so we notice that
(x_1)^{y_2}\in a^{y_1}Z now we want to know what happenes with x_1.
Suppose that x_1 is not in a^{y_1}Z So, this means that
x_1 \in m+ a^{y_1}Z for m=1,2,...,a^{y_1}-1 Now let m =1, for our case, so
x_1=1+a^{y_1}=>(x_1)^{y_2}=(1+ka^{y_1})^{y_2} we notice that when we expand the RHS all terms besides the first one will have an a^{y_1} so we can factor this one out, which means that also
(x_1)^{y_2} \in m+ a^{y_1}Z which is not true, so the contradition derived means that
x_1\in a^{y_1}Z=>x_1=a^{y_1}k, k \in Z
Now,
(x_1)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_ 2}=>(a^{y_1}k)^{y_2}=a^{y_1}(x_2)^{y_ 2}=>(x_2)^{y_2}=a^{y_1(y_2-1}}k^{y_2}
By doing the same reasoning we come to the point where
x_1=a^rk_1,x_2=a^rk_2, =>gcd(x_1,x_2)=a^r which contradicts the fact that gcd(x_1,x_2)=1 this way we have proved that
c= a^b=(a)^{\frac{y_1}{y_2}}
cannot be rational.
Indeed it can be rational only if y_2|y_1=> y_1=ky_2, k \in Z