1 dimensional problem, from Yale online physics course.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving projectile motion, specifically analyzing the trajectory of a stone thrown from a height of 100 m with an initial velocity of 10 m/s. The problem requires determining the maximum height reached, the time spent descending between specific heights, and the impact speed if a hole opens during its flight.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply kinematic equations to find the maximum height and time of descent, questioning the professor's approach regarding the velocities at different heights. Some participants raise concerns about the interpretation of height measurements and initial conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct use of initial conditions in kinematic equations, but there is still some confusion about the height references and how they relate to the initial velocity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the problem setup, particularly regarding the initial height and the reference points for velocity calculations. There is a recognition of the need to adhere to the specified heights in the problem statement.

ElectricRay
Messages
73
Reaction score
18
Hi All,

I found a free online course Physics from Yale I thought that must be pretty good well after watching the lecture and starting with the first problem I think I found something that is incorrect. Is anybody willing to tell me that i do somehting wrong (most probably I would expect that the prof at Yale has a pretty good understang of physics).

Homework Statement


From the top of a building of height h = 100 m I throw a stone up with velocity 10 m/s. What is
the maximum height it reaches, and when does this occur? How many seconds does it spend on
its way down between h = 50 m and h = 0 m? What is its velocity when h = 50 m? If, while the
stone is airborne, an earthquake opens up a hole 50 m deep in the ground, when and with what
speed will the stone hit the bottom?

Homework Equations


1) X(t) = X0 + v0t + 1/2at2
2) v = dX/dt = v0 * at ⇒ t = vt - v0 / a

Now when we plug in for the equation to find t in the first equation we get equation 3 below.

Xt - X0 = vt2 - v02 / 2a

So far so good, I guess

The Attempt at a Solution


We know when we throw up the stone at 10m/s at a certain point the speed will be 0m/s due to the gravitational force that's pulling on the stone so let's find out first how much time this takes with Eq 2:

v = dX/dt = v0 * at
0 = 10 -9.8 * t
t = 10 / 9.8 = 1.0 s

Now to find the maximum height we can use Eq 1.
X(t) = X0 + v0t + 1/2at2

Xmax = 100 + 10*1 - 1/2 * 9.8 * 12 = 105.1m

So far so good regarding the Proff his answer and mine. But now the weird stuff is going to happen. the proffesor. The next question we need to know is how much time it takes on it's way down between 50m and 0m.

We can use Eq 3 and let's call Xt - X0 = Δh so we get:
Δh = vt2 - v02 / 2a

Now the proff is going to calculate the two velocities at the height asked above so he pluges in for v1 50m and v2 100m.

v1 = -SQRT(102 + 2*9.8 * 50 = -32.9 ms
v2 = -SQRT(102 + 2*9.8 * 100 = -45.4 m/s

And here I dissagree: I think we should plug in 55m and 105m. This because I throwed up the stone to 105m this means the stone has more potential energy at 105m as at 100m and it will built up more speed on its way down! I think this is a crucial point of the problem but it could be that I am thinking wrong offcourse!

So I got the following answers for v1 and v2:
v1 = -SQRT(102 + 2*9.8 * 55 = -34.3 ms
v2 = -SQRT(102 + 2*9.8 * 105 = -46.5 m/s

Now I can calculate the time it took by taking the difference of the 2 velocities and plug it into Eq 2

t = -34.3- -46.5 / 9.8 = 1.2s

the Prof had 1.3s.

My answer is slightly different compared to the prof but that is not the point for me. It is the way how we think about what is happening physically.

Again I think when I throw up the stone to 105m it bults up more potential energy which is converted on its way down to kinetic energy. And it can built up little more from 105m instead of 100m.

So my big questin here is. Am I missing something here it can't be that a Prof at Yale missed such a crucial point in the problem solving and a rookie like me sees this. So in fact I am think I am wrong!

And comments would be highly appreciated.

Grtz Raymond
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ElectricRay said:
So my big questin here is. Am I missing something here it can't be that a Prof at Yale missed such a crucial point in the problem solving and a rookie like me sees this. So in fact I am think I am wrong!
Yes, you're wrong. It's true that the stone goes up to some height above the starting point, but that's already covered in the initial velocity. And you are told that you need to find the time between points h = 50 and h = 0, so you cannot go changing that.
 
Thanks a lot for the response.

Unfortunately I don't understand it. So h=50 is 50m for the max 105m or 50m from the 100m? This is what I don't undertsand, sounds maybe very silly question but that's not clear to me.
 
ElectricRay said:
Unfortunately I don't understand it. So h=50 is 50m for the max 105m or 50m from the 100m? This is what I don't undertsand, sounds maybe very silly question but that's not clear to me.
h is the height above the ground. Since you are told to find the time between the points where h = 50 and h = 0, those are heights you should use.

When you use the following kinematic equation
##v^2 = v_0^2 + 2 a \Delta x##
realize that the change in position must be measured from the point where you measured the initial velocity. Since you're using ##v_0 = 10##, you are measuring from h = 100.

If instead you used the highest point of the motion, the initial velocity would be set to zero, not 10 m/s. Make sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ElectricRay
Ahhhh offcourse EUREKA ;) yes that makes fully sense!

If I would do it my way I would have set the initial velocity to 0m/s and I will come on the same numbers! :)

I knew I made a wrong way of thinking somewhere, impossible that a rookie like me finds a mistake from a Prof at Yale, lol

Thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K