Engineering 2 identical circuits cascaded/laplace transform and impulse response

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of two identical circuits cascaded without loading effects, where the Laplace transform of the impulse response is given as 4/(s+1)^2. The impulse response of each circuit is determined to be H(s) = ±(2/(s+1)), leading to h(t) = ±2e^(-t). For the output of the second circuit when a unit step signal u(t) is applied to the first circuit, the Laplace transform of the output is derived as Vo(s) = Vi(s)H(s), with Vi(s) being 1/s.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace transforms and their properties
  • Knowledge of impulse response in linear time-invariant systems
  • Familiarity with transfer functions and circuit analysis
  • Basic concepts of cascading circuits and loading effects
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of impulse responses in cascaded systems
  • Learn about the impact of loading effects in circuit design
  • Explore the application of partial fraction decomposition in Laplace transforms
  • Investigate the significance of input and output impedance in circuit analysis
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students studying control systems or signal processing who are looking to deepen their understanding of cascading circuits and their responses.

gethelpelectr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical circuits are cascaded, without the second circuit having any loading effect on the first circuit. If the laplace transform of the impulse response of the cascade is 4/(s+1)^2. a)determine the impulse response of each circuit alone as a function of time.
b)if a signal u(t) is applied to the input of the first circuit, determine the output of the second circuit as a function of time

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a) the impulse response of each circuit is either H(s)=+-(2/s+1) so h(t)=+-2e^-t
b)the laplace transform of the output is (4/(s*(s+1)^2) then do partial fractions and u can easily make inverse laplace and get the answer
These are the soulutions to the problem, however I don't get them. What do they mean by the second circuit does not have any loading effect on the first? And why did they multiply laplace of u(t) with laplace of the cascade to get the laplace of the input? I'm not really understanding the concepts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An individual circuit has an input impedance and an output impedance. When you analyze such a circuit in isolation the assumed source driving its input has zero internal impedance and the circuit's output is an open circuit (infinite impedance). So the resulting transfer function is for the ideal case.

When you cascade two circuits, connecting the output of the first to the input of the next, the first circuit now "sees" the input impedance of the second as a load, while the second circuit "sees" an imperfect source with an impedance. These changed conditions will alter the responses of both circuits.

In practice when designing stages to be cascaded, one generally arranges things so that the input impedance of succeeding stages is much higher than the output impedance of the preceding stages (usually by a factor of 10 or so), so that they are effectively isolating the effects of one from the other and the individual transfer functions are not significantly perturbed.

For this problem you are told to ignore this loading effect, allowing the two transfer functions to stand unaltered.

As for your second question, the problem asks you to evaluate the output of the cascaded circuits in response to a unit step at the input of the first. The overall transfer function is:

##\frac{Vo(s)}{Vi(s)} = H(s)##

so that

##Vo(s) = Vi(s)H(s)##

and Vi(s) is the Laplace Transform of a unit step, which is 1/s.
 
You have really helped thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K