2008 Fnet=ma Exam: Bullet and Bob

  • Thread starter Thread starter compwiz3000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Exam
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bullet colliding with a pendulum bob, resulting in a perfectly inelastic collision. The goal is to determine the minimum initial velocity required for the combined system to complete a vertical loop. The subject area includes dynamics and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of momentum and energy principles, questioning the validity of certain steps in the original calculations. There is exploration of the implications of using a rigid rod versus a flexible string in the problem setup.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided alternative approaches, particularly emphasizing energy conservation over momentum. There is ongoing clarification regarding the equations used and the assumptions made, particularly concerning potential and kinetic energy at different points in the motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the effects of the pendulum's string not being rigid and the implications for the forces involved at the top of the loop. There is also uncertainty about the appropriateness of certain mathematical expressions and the treatment of energy terms in the context of the problem.

compwiz3000
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
A bullet of mass [tex]m_1[/tex] strikes a pendulum of mass [tex]m_2[/tex] suspended from a pivot by a string of length [tex]L[/tex] with a horizontal velocity [tex]v_0[/tex]. The collision is perfectly inelastic and the bullet sticks to the bob. Find the minimum velocity [tex]v_0[/tex] such that the bob (with the bullet inside) completes a circular vertical loop.

What did I do wrong:
Using conservation of momentum, we have
[tex]m_1 v_0 = \left(m_1+m_2\right) v_n.[/tex]
Then
[tex]v_n=\frac{m_1 v_0}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]
and
[tex]0=v_n^2+2a dx.[/tex]
Then
[tex]v_n^2=-2 \int_0^\pi -g \sin \theta L d \theta?[/tex]
I think that's where I screwed up?
If I follow my wrong steps, I end up with
[tex]v_0=\left(m_1+m_2\right)2 \sqrt{Lg}/m_1,[/tex]
but that's not the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This seems to be a bit of a trick question. The string is not rigid; it cannot provide an outward force at the top, so at the top of the loop the pendulum better have enough speed to not fall down. Your solution is correct if the string was replaced by a rigid rod.

For brevity I'll write M = m1 + m2. The speed required at the top of the loop is that for uniform circular motion with acceleration g: [tex]v_{top}^2/L = g[/tex], so at this point its kinetic energy is [tex]M v_{top}^2/2 = MgL/2[/tex]. At the minimum initial speed, the kinetic energy the pendulum and bullet have must equal the difference in potential energy at the top and bottom, plus this kinetic energy:

[tex]\frac12 M v_n^2 = 2MgL + \frac12 MgL = \frac52 MgL[/tex]
[tex]v_n = \sqrt{5gL}[/tex]
[tex]v_0 = \frac{M}{m_1} v_n = \frac{m_1 + m_2}{m_1} \sqrt{5gL}.[/tex]
 
Thanks.

Also, in my original solution, I wasn't sure if it was correct to say
[tex]v_n^2+2a\, dx = 0[/tex]
Can I just put that [tex]dx[/tex] in there? I kind of just guessed that I could do that.
Can somebody more rigorously do my solution for a rigid rod?

Also, can you elaborate on this?
"At the minimum initial speed, the kinetic energy the pendulum and bullet have must equal the difference in potential energy at the top and bottom, plus this kinetic energy"
I didn't understand what you were referring to in the equations.

EDIT:Wait, [tex]2MgL[/tex] is just potential energy right?
 
Last edited:
Yeah sorry, 2MgL is the change in potential energy and MgL/2 is the kinetic energy the thing must have at the top.

As for your initial question, what is a?

For the rigid rod, you can drop the MgL/2 term in the energy equation, and your original answer will be correct:
[tex]v_0 = 2 \frac{m_1 + m_2}{m_1} \sqrt{gL}.[/tex]
 
Last edited:
So is my calculus way rigorous or correct? I tried to use [tex]v_f^2=v_0^2+2ax[/tex] in my first attempt...is that wrong?

And for the rigid rod, I can drop the term because I can just have almost 0 kinetic energy at the top, right?
 
Yeah, that won't work since your acceleration isn't constant. It's really easy if you just use energy; that way you don't have to deal with possibly incorrect integrals and all that. You're correct about the 0 kinetic energy.
 
Thanks for the energy solution. I do prefer that solution. I just didn't think of how to do it that way.

Could you also show me a way to do it with integration?
 

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K