2014 F = MA #15 Torque Output Engine

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum sustained speed of a car on a 30-degree incline, given its engine's torque output and power. The key equations involve relating power, torque, and velocity, specifically P = τω and v_cm = rω. Participants clarify that the torque output due to gravity is mg sin θ R, and the instantaneous axis of rotation is at the point of contact with the ground, which is crucial for understanding rolling motion. The conversation also highlights that for maximum speed, the net force must equal zero, allowing static friction to be considered negligible. Ultimately, the maximum sustained speed is derived as v = 2P/mg.
Jzhang27143
Messages
38
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The maximum torque output from the engine of a new experimental car of mass m is τ . The
maximum rotational speed of the engine is ω. The engine is designed to provide a constant power
output P. The engine is connected to the wheels via a perfect transmission that can smoothly
trade torque for speed with no power loss. The wheels have a radius R, and the coefficient of
static friction between the wheels and the road is µ.

What is the maximum sustained speed v the car can drive up a 30 degree incline? Assume no
frictional losses and assume µ is large enough so that the tires do not slip.

Homework Equations



v_cm = rω, P = τω

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that P = τω = τv_cm /R. However, I do not quite understand how to find the torque output of the engine. The answer is v = 2P/mg. After rearranging the answer, I found that P = mg sin θ R * v/R so the torque output is mg sin θ R, the torque due to gravity. Under this assumption, the instantaneous axis of rotation must be at the point of contact. How would I know that from the problem itself? Is it something to do with how the engine works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jzhang27143 said:
the instantaneous axis of rotation must be at the point of contact.

This is true of all rolling motion (with no sliding)

It makes more sense when you imagine the velocity vectors of every point on the wheel

Edit:
The image I've attatched shows it for 3 points on the wheel (sorry it's the best I could find)

It should be explained in most (introductory) physics books in the "rolling/rotation" chapter(s)
 

Attachments

  • Rolling.jpg
    Rolling.jpg
    2 KB · Views: 444
Last edited:
Ok, that part makes sense to me now. However, how would I know to consider the axis of rotation to be at the point of contact instead of the center of mass in this question? I think that these two setups would lead to two different answers because rotation about the center of mass involves torque due to friction.
 
Calculating top speed

If you can calculate the engine power, great, because then the power at the drive wheels will be the same (as you have no losses), then you can involve the equation :

power (watts) = force overcome * velocity

Note : just a thought, the peak torque and peak power don't usually happen at the the same rpm

Ive added a picture, its not directly exact, but it shows the force curve derived from a constant power situation (as yours is), but the resistance forces are air drag and rolling resistance, whereas yours is a gravity based force.
 

Attachments

  • p026.jpg
    p026.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 433
  • p027.jpg
    p027.jpg
    38.5 KB · Views: 430
The second thumbnail is a 5 speed engine showing the drive forces through the gears, note the engine is revved beyond the torque peak in top gear (to peak power rpm), this coincides with top speed.
Its an anomoly worth noting, though not important in this case.
Dean
 
Wait so this is asking for the maximum sustained speed. Therefore, the net force must be 0 so f_static + Mg sin theta = F_engine. The correct answer for the max speed requires Mg sin theta = F_engine so f_static = 0. Why can we let the value of static friction go to 0? The problem states that mu is large enough so that the wheels don't slip.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K