2nd order differential eguation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a second-order differential equation of the form 2x^2y'' + xy' - y = 0, with a particular solution given as y = x. The task is to find the general solution and determine the values of x for which the solution is valid.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for finding the general solution, including the reduction of order method and substitutions like y = vx and y = x^n. Some express confusion about the transition from particular to general solutions.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their attempts and reasoning, with some noting the challenges they face in applying the reduction of order method. Guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the equation as a Euler equation, and there is acknowledgment of the importance of constants in the solution process. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is situated within a section focused on the reduction of order method, which may influence their approach. There is also mention of prior work involving differential equations with constant coefficients, highlighting a potential gap in familiarity with the current problem type.

MostlyHarmless
Messages
344
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Here is the problem, verbatim.

Observe that y=x is a particular solution of the equation 2x^2y&#039;&#039;+xy&#039;-y=0[\tex]<br /> and find the general solution. For what values of x is the solution valid?<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> I know the answer is ##y=c_1x+c_2x^{{\frac{-1}{2}}}##, but I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how on Earth I&#039;m even supposed to go about finding that solution. It should be noted that this is in the section for The Reduction of Order Method, so I assume it has to with that, however, everything we&#039;ve done thus far, since the introduction of differential operators, has only concerned Diff. Eq. w/ constant coefficients. So that&#039;s where I&#039;m hitting my main roadblock.<br /> <br /> I&#039;ve tried several things, none of which got me anywhere. For example: I tried re-writing the original expression as (2x^2D^2+xD-1)y=0 and letting ##y=c_1x+c_2y_1## I quickly realized that just takes me back to my original expression. <br /> <br /> I then tried letting y=vx, as per reduction of order method suggests. That would give ##y&#039;=v&#039;x+v## and ##y&#039;&#039;=v&#039;&#039;x+2v&#039;##<br /> plugging that into the original equation: <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+4x^2v&#039;+x^2v&#039;+xv-xv=0##<br /> <br /> The xv&#039;s will subtract out. Leaving <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+5x^2v&#039;=0## <br /> <br /> dividing by ##2x^3## gives <br /> v&amp;#039;&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}v&amp;#039;=0 <br /> Then I made the substitution w=v&#039;; w&#039;=v&#039;&#039; to make it first order linear in w. <br /> w&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}w=0 <br /> giving an integrating factor of <br /> <br /> ##e^{∫{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}}=x^{\frac{5}{2}}## Multiplying through I get d[wx^{\frac{5}{2}}]=0 Then that&#039;s where I get stuck. Integrating now will eventually give v=0, which is unhelpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jesse H. said:

Homework Statement


Here is the problem, verbatim.

Observe that y=x is a particular solution of the equation 2x^2y&#039;&#039;+xy&#039;-y=0[\tex]<br /> and find the general solution. For what values of x is the solution valid?<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> I know the answer is ##y=c_1x+c_2x^{{\frac{-1}{2}}}##, but I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how on Earth I&#039;m even supposed to go about finding that solution. It should be noted that this is in the section for The Reduction of Order Method, so I assume it has to with that, however, everything we&#039;ve done thus far, since the introduction of differential operators, has only concerned Diff. Eq. w/ constant coefficients. So that&#039;s where I&#039;m hitting my main roadblock.<br /> <br /> I&#039;ve tried several things, none of which got me anywhere. For example: I tried re-writing the original expression as (2x^2D^2+xD-1)y=0 and letting ##y=c_1x+c_2y_1## I quickly realized that just takes me back to my original expression. <br /> <br /> I then tried letting y=vx, as per reduction of order method suggests. That would give ##y&#039;=v&#039;x+v## and ##y&#039;&#039;=v&#039;&#039;x+2v&#039;##<br /> plugging that into the original equation: <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+4x^2v&#039;+x^2v&#039;+xv-xv=0##<br /> <br /> The xv&#039;s will subtract out. Leaving <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+5x^2v&#039;=0## <br /> <br /> dividing by ##2x^3## gives <br /> v&amp;#039;&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}v&amp;#039;=0 <br /> Then I made the substitution w=v&#039;; w&#039;=v&#039;&#039; to make it first order linear in w. <br /> w&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}w=0 <br /> giving an integrating factor of <br /> <br /> ##e^{∫{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}}=x^{\frac{5}{2}}## Multiplying through I get d[wx^{\frac{5}{2}}]=0 Then that&#039;s where I get stuck. Integrating now will eventually give v=0, which is unhelpful.
<br /> <br /> That&#039;s a Euler equation. You can tell by the way the powers of x match up with the order of the differentiation. The appropriate substitution to try is ##y=x^n##. Try to solve for n.
 
Jesse H. said:

Homework Statement


Here is the problem, verbatim.

Observe that y=x is a particular solution of the equation 2x^2y&#039;&#039;+xy&#039;-y=0[\tex]<br /> and find the general solution. For what values of x is the solution valid?<br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> I know the answer is ##y=c_1x+c_2x^{{\frac{-1}{2}}}##, but I cannot, for the life of me, figure out how on Earth I&#039;m even supposed to go about finding that solution. It should be noted that this is in the section for The Reduction of Order Method, so I assume it has to with that, however, everything we&#039;ve done thus far, since the introduction of differential operators, has only concerned Diff. Eq. w/ constant coefficients. So that&#039;s where I&#039;m hitting my main roadblock.<br /> <br /> I&#039;ve tried several things, none of which got me anywhere. For example: I tried re-writing the original expression as (2x^2D^2+xD-1)y=0 and letting ##y=c_1x+c_2y_1## I quickly realized that just takes me back to my original expression. <br /> <br /> I then tried letting y=vx, as per reduction of order method suggests. That would give ##y&#039;=v&#039;x+v## and ##y&#039;&#039;=v&#039;&#039;x+2v&#039;##<br /> plugging that into the original equation: <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+4x^2v&#039;+x^2v&#039;+xv-xv=0##<br /> <br /> The xv&#039;s will subtract out. Leaving <br /> <br /> ##2x^3v&#039;&#039;+5x^2v&#039;=0## <br /> <br /> dividing by ##2x^3## gives <br /> v&amp;#039;&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}v&amp;#039;=0 <br /> Then I made the substitution w=v&#039;; w&#039;=v&#039;&#039; to make it first order linear in w. <br /> w&amp;#039;+{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}w=0 <br /> giving an integrating factor of <br /> <br /> ##e^{∫{\frac{5}{2}}x^{-1}}=x^{\frac{5}{2}}## Multiplying through I get d[wx^{\frac{5}{2}}]=0 Then that&#039;s where I get stuck. Integrating now will eventually give v=0, which is unhelpful.
<br /> <br /> Don&#039;t give up, you are almost there. ##(wx^{\frac 5 2})&#039; = 0## gives ##wx^{\frac 5 2}=C## or ##w = Cx^{-\frac 5 2}##. So what is ##v##? Then what do you get for your second solution ##xv##? And you don&#039;t need to worry about the multiplying constant since any constant times a solution is a solution.
 
Dick said:
That's a Euler equation. You can tell by the way the powers of x match up with the order of the differentiation. The appropriate substitution to try is ##y=x^n##. Try to solve for n.

Don't you think that misses the point of the question? They are learning reduction of order.
 
LCKurtz said:
Don't you think that misses the point of the question? They are learning reduction of order.

Yes, I did gloss over that point. I just picked the easiest way to a solution. Apologies.
 
So just do the same method I'm doing, but rather than y=vx use ##y=x^n##? Or is there a specific way of solving a Euler equation? I've not studied them before, but I can find out how to do them fairly quickly if you wouldn't mind giving me one more nudge.
 
Oh ok, I can't believe I forgot my constant!
 
Alright, I got: ##∫v'=∫c_1x^{\frac{-5}{2}}dx## Which gives ##v=c_1x^{\frac{-3}{2}}+c_2## multiplying through by x to get back to y gives: ##y=c_1x^{\frac{-1}{2}}+c_2x## which was the correct answer.

Thank you guys. I'd been struggling with that for awhile, I was just forgetting the constant!
 
Jesse H. said:
Alright, I got: ##∫v'=∫c_1x^{\frac{-5}{2}}dx## Which gives ##v=c_1x^{\frac{-3}{2}}+c_2## multiplying through by x to get back to y gives: ##y=c_1x^{\frac{-1}{2}}+c_2x## which was the correct answer.

Thank you guys. I'd been struggling with that for awhile, I was just forgetting the constant!

And recognizing it as a Euler equation does give you a huge shortcut which doesn't use reduction of order. Put y=x^n cancel the x^n's and just solve for n. Try it. It's a pretty good trick to know.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K