2nd order linear non-homogeneous ODE - having trouble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a second-order linear non-homogeneous ordinary differential equation (ODE) related to a suspension system subjected to a road bump. The mass is 270 kg, and the spring coefficient is 70,000 N/m. The minimum damping coefficient required to avoid oscillation is calculated to be 8,695 N-m/s. The user is seeking clarification on the choice of the particular solution for the non-homogeneous part of the equation, specifically why a linear polynomial was selected instead of a constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of damping in mechanical systems
  • Knowledge of characteristic equations and their roots
  • Experience with solving non-homogeneous ODEs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of undetermined coefficients for finding particular solutions in ODEs
  • Learn about critically damped systems and their implications in mechanical engineering
  • Explore the use of Laplace transforms for solving linear differential equations
  • Investigate the effects of different forcing functions on system response
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mechanical engineering, particularly those focusing on dynamics and vibration analysis, as well as anyone studying differential equations in applied contexts.

InSaNiUm
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement :
This problem is in regard to a suspension system (mass, spring, dashpot) subjected to a 2 cm bump in the road. Given the mass and spring coefficient, we are to find:

a) The minimum damping coefficient, c, to avoid oscillation.
b) The expression for amplitude of vibration of the mass after the vehicle runs over the bump.
c) The amplitude of vibration 1 ms and 1 sec after running over the bump.

m = 270kg
k = 70,000N/m
d = 2cm (height of bump)

Homework Equations


[tex]my'' + cy' +ky = f(t)[/tex]
This is a non-homogeneous equation, so:
[tex]y(t) = y_h(t) + y_p(t)[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


For part a I used the homogeneous solution:
[tex]y'' + \frac{c}{m}y' + \frac{k}{m}y = 0[/tex]
to find the characteristic:
[tex]r^2 + \frac{c}{m}r + \frac{k}{m} = 0[/tex]
Inside it's quadratic, I set [tex](\frac{c}{m})^2 - 4\frac{k}{m} = 0[/tex] for the critically damped case and got [tex]c_{min} = 8,695[/tex]N-m/s.

Since this gives me two identical roots the soln becomes [tex]y_h(t) = c_1e^{-16t} + c_2te^{-16t}[/tex]

I'm pretty sure that's right, but the part I'm stumped on is how to solve the particular solution.

I tried solving it with the forcing function being an impulsive function [tex]f(t) = d(\frac{1}{\epsilon})[/tex] where d is the .02m bump. I chose t=0 for the impulse.

[tex]y_p'' + \frac{c}{m}y_p' + \frac{k}{m}y_p = \frac{2}{m\epsilon}[/tex]for [tex]0<t<\epsilon[/tex]
I chose polynomials for the solution:
[tex]y_p = A_0 + A_1t[/tex]
so:
[tex]y_p' = A_1[/tex] and [tex]y_p'' = 0[/tex]
When I plug this back in I get:
[tex]\frac{c}{m}A_1 + \frac{k}{m}(A_0 + A_1t) = \frac{2}{m\epsilon}[/tex]

Now, how do I separate the coefficients? Have I gone astray somewhere? I don't know where to go from here.
Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain WHY you chose y= A0+A1t as the particular solution. As long as t is less than [itex]\epsilon[/itex], your right hand side is a constant. Why not just y= A?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K