2nd order pertubation theory of harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the 2nd order energy shift in a harmonic oscillator using perturbation theory, specifically with the perturbation \(\hat{H}'=\alpha \hat{p}\), where \(\hat{p}\) is defined in terms of ladder operators \(a_{+}\) and \(a_{-}\). The formula for the 2nd order energy shift is given by \(E_{n}^{2}=\sum\limits_{m\ne n}{\frac{{{\left| \left\langle \psi _{m}^{0} \right|H'\left| \psi _{n}^{0} \right\rangle \right|}^{2}}}{E_{n}^{0}-E_{m}^{0}}\). The key insight is that while calculating the integrals, only one of them will be non-zero for a given \(m\), leading to a single expression for the energy shift rather than multiple cases based on the relationship between \(n\) and \(m\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically perturbation theory.
  • Familiarity with harmonic oscillators and ladder operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of wave functions and their inner products.
  • Ability to perform integrals involving quantum states.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the 2nd order perturbation theory in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the properties of ladder operators \(a_{+}\) and \(a_{-}\) in harmonic oscillators.
  • Learn about the implications of non-zero integrals in quantum state transitions.
  • Investigate examples of perturbation theory applications in different quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on perturbation theory and harmonic oscillators, will benefit from this discussion.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm having some trouble calculating the 2nd order energy shift in a problem.
I am given the pertubation:
\hat{H}'=\alpha \hat{p},
where $\alpha$ is a constant, and \hat{p} is given by:
p=i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega }{2}}\left( {{a}_{+}}-{{a}_{-}} \right),
where {a}_{+} and {a}_{-} are the usual ladder operators.

Homework Equations


Now, according to my book, the 2nd order energy shift is given by:
E_{n}^{2}=\sum\limits_{m\ne n}{\frac{{{\left| \left\langle \psi _{m}^{0} \right|H'\left| \psi _{n}^{0} \right\rangle \right|}^{2}}}{E_{n}^{0}-E_{m}^{0}}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Now, what I have tried to do is to calculate the term inside the power of 2. And so far I have done this:
\begin{align}<br /> &amp; E_{n}^{1}=\alpha i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega }{2}}\int{\psi _{m}^{*}\left( {{{\hat{a}}}_{+}}-{{{\hat{a}}}_{-}} \right)}\,{{\psi }_{n}}\,dx=\alpha i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega }{2}}\left( \int{\psi _{m}^{*}\,{{{\hat{a}}}_{+}}{{\psi }_{n}}\,dx-\int{\psi _{m}^{*}\,{{{\hat{a}}}_{-}}{{\psi }_{n}}\,dx}} \right) \\ <br /> &amp; =\alpha i\sqrt{\frac{\hbar m\omega }{2}}\left( \sqrt{n+1}\int{\psi _{m}^{*}\,{{\psi }_{n+1}}\,dx-\sqrt{n}\int{\psi _{m}^{*}\,{{\psi }_{n-1}}\,dx}} \right) <br /> \end{align}<br />
As you can see, I end up with the two integrals. But I don't know what to do next ? 'Cause if m &gt; n, and only by 1, then the first integral will be 1, and the other will be zero. And if n &gt; m, only by 1, then the second integral will be 1, and the first will be zero. Otherwise both will be zero.
And it seems wrong to have to make two expressions for the energy shift for n &gt; m and m &gt; n.

So am I on the right track, or doing it totally wrong ?

Thanks in advance.Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track. You will not have two different expressions depending on your n and m values because you sum over the m values. So you will only have two integrals that are not zero but you will sum and square them giving you one second order energy shift.
 
Hmmm, not sure I understand.
How can the two integrals be not zero at the same time ?

As far as I know, the integrals above is either zero if n \neq m, and 1 if n = m.
And this is, as far as I can see, not possible for both of them at the same time. At least not in the way I have written it down. Or...?
 
The two integrals do not have to be nonzero at the same time (i.e., for the same m). One integral will be nonzero for one value of m and the other integral will be nonzero for a different value of m.
 
Right so just for an example pretend you had m=5. When summing over n you would keep the n=4 term and the n=6 term because these would be the only two non-zero integrals.
 
I see...
Thank you very much :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K