I 2nd order Taylor Series for a function in 3 or more variables?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the lack of resources for deriving the second-order Taylor series for functions in three or more variables. The general expression involves partial derivatives evaluated at a point, typically zero, and can be expressed using multi-index notation. An example illustrates how to find coefficients for specific terms in the expansion, emphasizing the complexity of higher-order expansions. The conversation also touches on the distinction between Taylor and Maclaurin series, with a suggestion to use concise notation for clarity. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges and methods for working with multi-variable Taylor series.
JorgeM
Messages
30
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
Hello there, I need to get the Taylor Series for f(r) and r is a function f(x,y,z))=r
I have taken a look but most books and Online stuff just menctions the First order Taylor for 3 variables or the 2nd order Taylor series for just 2 variables.
Could you please tell me which is the general expression for 2nd order Taylor series in 3 or more variables? Because I have not found nothing at all.
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hint:
df(x, y, z)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}dy+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}dz
 
I usually don't like videos for teaching but this is not bad:

 
  • Like
Likes Dr Transport
JorgeM said:
Summary: Hello there, I need to get the Taylor Series for f(r) and r is a function f(x,y,z))=r

Some people make a distinction between a Taylor Series and a McLaurin Series. Let's assume you mean you want an expression for ##f(x,y,z)## in powers of ##x,y,z## rather than in powers of ##(x-a),(y-b),(z-c)##

It is a strenuous exercise in LaTex to write it out higher order multi-variable expansions in ordinary notation. ( No wonder you only got hints - and I don't volunteer to write it out that way myself !)

You can find it written out in the "multi-index notation" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-index_notation
I'm not skilled at reading the mult-index notation. I'll try some concrete examples.

Example: consider the 6th order expansion of ##f(x,y,z,w)## What is the coefficient of ##x^3 y^1 z^2 w^0## in that expansion?

It is:
##\frac{ 1}{3!\ 1!\ 2!\ 0!}## ## \frac{\partial^3 f}{\partial x^3} \frac{\partial^1 f}{\partial y^1} \frac{\partial^2 f}{\partial z^2} \frac{\partial^0 f}{\partial w^0}##

where the partial derivatives are evaluated at x = y = z = w = 0 and keeping in mind the definition 0! = 1! = 1 and using the convention that ##\frac{\partial^0 f}{\partial w^0} = 1##

The above expressions implicitly use the multi-index {3,1,2,0}.

----------

For a third order expansion in powers of ##f(x,y,z)##, we could employ some concise (and atrocious?) notation such as saying ##T(a,b,c)## will abbreviate ##\frac{1}{a! \ b! \ c!} \frac{\partial^a f}{\partial x^a} \frac{\partial^b f}{\partial y^b} \frac{\partial^c z}{\partial z^c} x^a y^b z^c## and define ##T(0,0,0) = f(0,0,0)##

## f(x,y,z) =##
## T(0,0,0) ##
## + T(1,0,0) + T(0,1,0) + T(0,0,1) ##
## + T(2,0,0) + T(1,1,0) + T(1,0,1) + T(0,2,0) + T(0,1,1) + T(0,0,2)##
## + T(3,0,0) + T(2,1,0) + T(2,0,1) + T(1,2,0) + T(1,1,1) + T(1,0,2) + T(0,3,0) + T(0,2,1) + T(0,1,2) + T(0,0,3)##

Someone should check my work.
 
  • Like
Likes JorgeM and Delta2
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top