MHB -3 circles centers on line segment PQ

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circles Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the geometric relationship of three circles with respect to a line segment PQ, emphasizing that conclusions should be drawn from observation rather than assumptions. It highlights that the diameters of the two smaller circles should not be assumed equal. The large circle's diameter is expressed as the sum of the segments PR and RQ, reinforcing the importance of precise calculations. Participants note that GRE diagrams often lack clarity, which can lead to incorrect assumptions. Overall, the conversation stresses careful analysis in geometric problems.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
GRE236.pngit was done by simple observation
typos maybe,,,,

Also, posted on MeWe and Linkedin
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
One should not assume the two smaller diameters are equal ...

Large circle diameter, $D = PR+RQ$

$\pi D = \pi(PR+RQ) = \pi \cdot PR + \pi \cdot RQ$
 
good point...

yes I know often the GRE diagrams are not for assumptions
so just adding as equal term is not absolute
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
59
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top