3-D Dirac Delta Fnc (DDF) Evaluated

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the evaluation of the 3-D Dirac Delta Function (DDF) in the context of electric charge density, specifically for a point charge q at position \(\vec{r}'\). The correct expression for the charge density is \(\rho(\vec{r}) = q\delta(\vec{r}-\vec{r}')\), which integrates to q over the volume. The user initially questioned the need to express \(\rho\) as \(\frac{q}{4\pi}\) in spherical coordinates, but later clarified that the integral of the DDF over all dimensions equals 1, confirming the original expression is valid. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the properties of the Dirac Delta Function in various coordinate systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac Delta Function and its properties
  • Familiarity with electric charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates and volume integrals
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac Delta Function in multiple dimensions
  • Learn about electric charge density and its applications in electromagnetism
  • Explore integration techniques in spherical coordinates
  • Investigate the use of curvilinear coordinates in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, mathematical physics, and advanced calculus. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the Dirac Delta Function and its applications in charge density evaluations.

Living_Dog
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hi,

After reading DJGriffiths sections on the DDF I have a question about evaluating it in regards Prob. 1.46 (a), to wit:

"Write an expression for the electric charge density [tex]\rho(\vec{r})[/tex] of a point charge q at [tex]\vec{r}[/tex]'. Make sure that the volume integral of [tex]\rho[/tex] equals q."

This is easily done in rectangular coordinates, namely, let [tex]\rho(\vec{r}) = q\delta(\vec{r}-\vec{r}')[/tex].

Checking that this resultsin a volume integral of q I did:

[tex]\int_V \rho(\vec{r}) d\tau = \int_V q\delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') d\tau = q \int_V \delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') d\tau = q \cdot 1 = q.[/tex]

Here is my question: doing the integral as is I get the correct answer. However, when I wrote it out in spherical coord's. It seems that I should rewrite [tex]\rho(\vec{r})[/tex] as [tex]\frac{q}{4\pi}[/tex]?

Why? Because:

[tex]\int_V \rho(\vec{r}) d\tau = \frac{q}{4\pi} \int_V \delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') dr d\Omega = \frac{q}{4\pi} \cdot \int_0^R \delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') dr \cdot \int_0^{4\pi} d\Omega = \frac{q}{4\pi} \cdot 4\pi \cdot \int_0^R \delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') dr = q \int_0^R \delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') dr = q[/tex].

So my question is: is this second form of evaluation correct? And if it is, then why does [tex]\rho[/tex] have two different expressions? Also, what about other curvilinear coordinates? Shouldn't his expression be independent of the geometry being used? So I suspect there is something wrong with my second evaluation. Can you not integrate over [tex]\delta^3[/tex] over one dimension?

tia!
-LD

EDIT: I see it now. I was missing the fact that [tex]\delta^3(\vec{r}-\vec{r}') = \delta(r-r')\delta(\theta-\theta')\delta(\phi-\phi')[/tex] and so the integral over [tex]\Omega[/tex] is still 1 and not [tex]4\pi[/tex].

PS: I wasn't sure if I should have deleted this post having figured out the correct answer, or leave it and post what I found out. Let me know and I will do whatever is the correct procedure here.

thx!
-LD
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are integrating the delta function incorrectly in your last formula. Since it is a 3 dimensional delta, its integral over all 3 dimensions, not just r, is equal to 1.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are integrating the delta function incorrectly in your last formula. Since it is a 3 dimensional delta, its integral over all 3 dimensions, not just r, is equal to 1.

:) You caught me mid-edit! :)

but thanks for the confirmation! :!)

-LD
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K