3dB Frequency of an LED Transfer Function

Click For Summary
The LED transfer function is defined as H(ω_m) = 1/(1+jω_mτ_c), with the 3-dB modulation bandwidth f_3dB representing the frequency where H(ω_m) is reduced by 3 dB. The derived expression for f_3dB is f_3dB = √3/(2πτ_c), which is questioned due to confusion over the calculation. The misunderstanding arises from the distinction between power and amplitude; the 3 dB point corresponds to a √2 reduction in amplitude, not a factor of 2. The original problem is deemed misstatated, as it implies a contradiction regarding the definition of the 3 dB point.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


According to my textbook:

The LED transfer function ##H(\omega_m)## is defined as:

$$H(\omega_m) = \frac{1}{1+j\omega_{m}\tau_{c}}$$

The 3-dB modulation bandwidth ##f_{\text{3 dB}}## is defined as the modulation frequency at which ##H(\omega_m)## is reduced by 3 dB or by a factor of 2. The result is:

$$f_{\text{3 dB}}=\sqrt{3}(2\pi\tau_{c})^{-1} \tag{1}$$

I don't understand how they derived the last expression.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##G(j\omega_{m})=\frac{1}{1+j\omega_{m}\tau_{c}}##.

##|G(j\omega_{m})|^{2}=\frac{1}{1+j\omega_{m}\tau_{c}}.\frac{1}{1-j\omega_{m}\tau_{c}}=\frac{1}{1+\omega_{m}^{2}\tau_{c}^{2}}##

##\therefore |G(j\omega_{m})|=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\omega_{m}^{2}\tau_{c}^{2}}}##

And ##|G(0)|=1##, therefore to find the 3 dB point we must solve:

$$\frac{|G(j\omega)|}{|G(0)|}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\omega_{\text{3 dB}}^{2}\tau_{c}^{2}}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$

However when I solve this I get:

$$\omega_{\text{3 dB}}=\frac{1}{\tau_{c}}\ \text{or}\ f_{\text{3 dB}}=\frac{1}{2\pi\tau_{c}}$$

So where does the ##\sqrt{3}## factor in equation (1) come from? What is the mistake here? :confused:

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this is problem as stated is a mess.

They're apparently thinking 3dB of power, not whatever the units of H(w) are (light power output/current input?). Your H(w) is down by a factor of √2, not 2, at w = 1/T. So the problem actually is a contradiction in terms since it gives H(w) as 1/(1+ jwT) which at 3dB down (i.e. 1/√2) gives w = 1/T as you found.

So they meant 3dB down in power which is 6dB down in H(w) which gives their posted answer. But the problem is misstated.
 
  • Like
Likes roam, donpacino and berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
793
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K