MHB 5.2 another Ax=B with an inverse

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Suppose we are given
$A^{-1} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 4 & 0 \\
2 & 3 & 0 \\
4 & 2 & 2
\end{bmatrix}
=
\left[\begin{array}{rrr|rrr}
1&4&0&1&0&0\\
2&3&0&0&1&0\\
4&2&2&0&0&1
\end{array}\right]$
then
$A=
\begin{bmatrix}
-\frac{3}{5}&\frac{4}{5}&0\\ \frac{2}{5}&-\frac{1}{5}&0\\ \frac{4}{5}&-\frac{7}{5}&\frac{1}{2}
\end{bmatrix}$
Solve the matrix equation $AX=B$ to find $x$, $y$ and $z$ where $X =
\begin{bmatrix}
x \\y \\z
\end{bmatrix},
\textit{ and }
B = \begin{bmatrix}
-1 \\2 \\3
\end{bmatrix}$
$\therefore AX=B$ is
$\begin{bmatrix}
-\frac{3}{5}&\frac{4}{5}&0\\ \frac{2}{5}&-\frac{1}{5}&0\\ \frac{4}{5}&-\frac{7}{5}&\frac{1}{2}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x \\y \\z
\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}
-1 \\2 \\3
\end{bmatrix}$
$W\vert A$ returned
$x=7,y=4,z=6$ok my question is that A has 2 zero's in $C_3$
I was able to get x=7 and y=4 by a simple double simultanious equation
but not sure what the proper methed is take advantage of the 2 zeros
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
Suppose we are given
$A^{-1} =
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 4 & 0 \\
2 & 3 & 0 \\
4 & 2 & 2
\end{bmatrix}
=
\left[\begin{array}{rrr|rrr}
1&4&0&1&0&0\\
2&3&0&0&1&0\\
4&2&2&0&0&1
\end{array}\right]$
then
$A=
\begin{bmatrix}
-\frac{3}{5}&\frac{4}{5}&0\\ \frac{2}{5}&-\frac{1}{5}&0\\ \frac{4}{5}&-\frac{7}{5}&\frac{1}{2}
\end{bmatrix}$
Solve the matrix equation $AX=B$ to find $x$, $y$ and $z$ where $X =
\begin{bmatrix}
x \\y \\z
\end{bmatrix},
\textit{ and }
B = \begin{bmatrix}
-1 \\2 \\3
\end{bmatrix}$
$\therefore AX=B$ is
$\begin{bmatrix}
-\frac{3}{5}&\frac{4}{5}&0\\ \frac{2}{5}&-\frac{1}{5}&0\\ \frac{4}{5}&-\frac{7}{5}&\frac{1}{2}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x \\y \\z
\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}
-1 \\2 \\3
\end{bmatrix}$
$W\vert A$ returned
$x=7,y=4,z=6$ok my question is that A has 2 zero's in $C_3$
I was able to get x=7 and y=4 by a simple double simultanious equation
but not sure what the proper methed is take advantage of the 2 zeros
If you are asking if it makes sense to write out the two equations in x and y that don't involve z and solving the simpler system for x and y then I think you are doing just fine.

-Dan
 
You are given that A^{-1} exists and is equal to \begin{bmatrix}1& 4 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 4 & 2 & 2 \end{bmatrix}. So the solution to AX= B is just X= A^{-1}B.

With B given as \begin{bmatrix}-1 \\ 2 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}, as here, we have immediately that X= \begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}1& 4 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 0 \\ 4 & 2 & 2 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}-1 \\ 2 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}7 \\ 4 \\ 6\end{bmatrix}. That is, x= 7, y= 4, and z= 6. But we can write the initial "AX= B" as the system of equstions -\frac{3}{5}x+ \frac{4}{5}y= -1, \frac{2}{5}x- \frac{1}{5}y= 2, and \frac{4}{5}x- \frac{7}{5}y+ \frac{1}{2}z= 3. As topsquark said, the fact that the first two entries in the last column are "0" mean that the first two equations have no "z" and can be solved for x and y indpendently of z. I would first multiply each equation by 5 to get -3x+ 4y= -5 and 2x- y= 10. Multiply the second equation by 4 to geta 8x- 4y= 40 and add that to the first equation to eliminate y and get 5x= 35 so that x= 7. Setting x= 7 in -3x+ 4y= -5 gives -21+ 4y= -5 so that 4y= 16 and y= 4. Finally, put x= 7, y= 4 into the last equation to get \frac{28}{5}- \frac{28}{5}+ \frac{1}{2}z= \frac{1}{2}z= 3 so that z= 6. We get x= 7, y= 4, z= 6 as before.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top