MHB 5.3 Show that a square matrix with a zero row is not invertible.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Show that a square matrix with a zero row is not invertible.
first a matrix has to be a square to be invertable
if
$$\det \begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&1\end{pmatrix}=1$$
then $$\begin{pmatrix}
1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&1\end{pmatrix}^{-1}
=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ -3&0&1
\end{pmatrix}$$
but if $r_1$ is all zeros
$$\det \begin{pmatrix}
0&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&0
\end{pmatrix}=0$$
then
$$\begin{pmatrix}
0&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&0
\end{pmatrix}^{-1} DNE$$ok I,m not real sure formally why this is ...

I could only do so with an example.:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
if
$$\det \begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&1\end{pmatrix}=1$$
then $$\begin{pmatrix}
1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ 3&0&1\end{pmatrix}^{-1}
=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0&1&0\\ -3&0&1
\end{pmatrix}$$
This reminds me a joke. A tourist asks a local resident: "If I go down this street, will there be a railway station?" The local replies, "The station will be there even if you don't go down that street".

Suppose the $i$th row of a square matrix $A$ consists entirely of zeros. What is the $i$th row in the matrix $AB$ for any size-compatible matrix $B$? Can $AB$ be the identity matrix?
 
so what would AB look like in your example
 
One cannot say much about about $AB$ in general without knowing more about $A$ and $B$, but we can know the $i$th row of $AB$. I suggest you use the definition of matrix multiplication to find what that row is. If you want, you can consider an example where $A$ is the matrix from your original post where the first row has all zeros and $B$ is an arbitrary 3x3 matrix. However, it is pretty obvious what the $i$th row of $AB$ is in general if the $i$th row of $A$ consists of zeros.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K