A Beam of rectangular cross section 200mm deep and 100mm wide

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing the dimensions of a rectangular beam with a cross-section of 200mm deep and 100mm wide to minimize stress. The flexure formula M/I = σ/y = E/R is utilized to analyze stress values, with specific calculations yielding results of 8.333 kN and 12.5 kN for different scenarios. Participants emphasize the importance of using calculus to determine the optimal ratio of dimensions while maintaining a fixed cross-sectional area. The conversation highlights the need for a systematic approach to beam optimization in structural engineering.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the flexure formula in structural mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of beam stress analysis
  • Familiarity with calculus for optimization problems
  • Concept of fixed cross-sectional area in beam design
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the flexure formula in beam design
  • Learn about optimization techniques in structural engineering
  • Explore calculus methods for maximizing or minimizing functions
  • Investigate the relationship between cross-sectional area and stress distribution
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in beam design and optimization will benefit from this discussion.

forexpipz
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please visit my flickr link for a scanned image of the problem statement.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/93763273@N05/8815418518/lightbox/


Homework Equations



M/I = σ/y = E/R This is the flexure or bending formula.

The Attempt at a Solution




a) = 8.333 kN
b) = 12.5 kN
c) = I can do this one

d)

This one is giving me some difficulty. If I increase the 200mm dimension by 20% the stress value goes down 8680 Newtons. I have played around with the other dimension but this could be a laborious process. Could someone please explain to me how I would go about this. Is there some sort of optimal ratio here. Can I use calculus and if so just how do i go about it? Much appreciated.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
forexpipz said:
Can I use calculus and if so just how do i go about it?
Yes, you'll need calculus. It seems intuitive to use as much cross-sectional area as allowed, but we need not assume that. I would approach it as supposing the area is fixed as A and optimising the ratio for that area. Having found that relationship, you can go about optimising the area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K