A box slides down a plank, Find its velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Girn261
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a box sliding down an inclined plank with specified dimensions and a coefficient of friction. Participants are tasked with determining the velocity of the box at the end of the plank after being released from rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations and the Pythagorean theorem to find the acceleration and distance. There are multiple attempts to calculate the velocity, with some participants expressing confusion over the values used for acceleration and distance.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared their calculations and expressed uncertainty about the results. There is a recognition of potential arithmetic errors and a request for clearer presentation of the working steps. One participant has indicated they figured out their mistakes, while others are still exploring different methods, including conservation of energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share. There is an ongoing discussion about the correct interpretation of the plank's dimensions and the effects of friction on the calculations.

Girn261

Attachments

  • 20170819_135458_HDR.jpg
    20170819_135458_HDR.jpg
    14.5 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
1.2 m length of plank.
 
haruspex said:
1.2 m length of plank.

hmm, still get wrong answer.. With 1.2m being the length of the incline, I get 1.039 for the "x" length. and with V being 1.3544
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please show your working. I solved it two different ways (one of which was your method using plank length = 1.2) and both give same answer (which wasn't 1.3544). So most likely an arithmetic error somewhere.
 
CWatters said:
Please show your working. I solved it two different ways (one of which was your method using plank length = 1.2) and both give same answer (which wasn't 1.3544). So most likely an arithmetic error somewhere.
1.2^2=a^2+0.6m^2
a=1.039

v^2=u^2+2(a)(s)
0+(2)(.8829)(1.039)
sqrt 1.834 = 1.3544
 
Girn261 said:
1.2^2=a^2+0.6m^2
a=1.039
v^2=u^2+2(a)(s)
0+(2)(.8829)(1.039)
sqrt 1.834 = 1.3544

It's confusing using "a" for two things.

The acceleration isn't 0.8829 m/s/s. Show how you got that.

The distance the object moves isn't 1.039m it's 1.2m.

Sorry got to go to bed now. It's nearly midnight here.
 
ATTACH]
cmUPI2t.jpg
CWatters said:
It's confusing using "a" for two things.

The acceleration isn't 0.8829 m/s/s. Show how you got that.

The distance the object moves isn't 1.039m it's 1.2m.

Sorry got to go to bed now. It's nearly midnight here.

Please see picture for how I got acceleration
 
Girn261 said:
ATTACH]
cmUPI2t.jpg


Please see picture for how I got acceleration
This seems to be your first picture again, with the wrong plank length.
 
haruspex said:
This seems to be your first picture again, with the wrong plank length.

I know, just quoting to show how I got acceleration. With plank as A or B in pythagorean theorem, I still get wrong answer
 
  • #10
Girn261 said:
I know, just quoting to show how I got acceleration. With plank as A or B in pythagorean theorem, I still get wrong answer
Please post your working for how you get the wrong acceleration eventhough using the right plank length.
And, please, not as an image. Take the trouble to type your algebra so that people can read it much more easily and quote parts to point out errors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
  • #11
Girn261 said:
I know, just quoting to show how I got acceleration.

The equation for the acceleration contains terms Sin and Cos, you need to redo these calculations because they are also affected by the error with the plank length.
 
  • #12
I figured out my mistakes. Thank you for everyones help, I really appreciate this forum.
 
  • #13
What answer did you get?

Just for info, the alternative method I used was to apply conservation of energy.

The final KE = Initial PE - Wf

where
Wf = the work done against friction = L * μmgCosθ
L = length of plank

so..

0.5mv2 = mgh - μmgLCosθ

mass cancels.
Rearrange to give

v = SQRT(2g(h - uLCosθ))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K