A box sliding down a incline plane

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the acceleration of a 3kg block sliding down a 30-degree incline over a distance of 2m in 1.5 seconds. The correct approach involves using the kinematic equation for motion under constant acceleration: x(t) = x₀ + v₀t + ½at². The user mistakenly attempted to calculate acceleration using the formula x/(t²), which is incorrect as it does not account for the initial conditions and factors in the kinematic equation. The correct acceleration can be derived from the proper application of the kinematic equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations
  • Basic knowledge of motion under constant acceleration
  • Familiarity with calculus for differentiation
  • Concept of initial conditions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations for one-dimensional motion
  • Learn how to apply initial conditions in motion problems
  • Explore the concept of differentiation in physics
  • Practice solving problems involving constant acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone looking to improve their understanding of motion under constant acceleration.

semc
Messages
364
Reaction score
5
A 3kg block starts from rest at the top of a 30degree incline and slides a distance of 2m down the incline in 1.5s find the magnitude of the acceleration.

I have always though to find the acceleration you can just use x/(t*t) but i use this formula but i couldn't get the same as the book. is there something wrong with my understanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your formula is incorrect.

You need to use the basic kinematic equation for motion under constant acceleration here. If you happen to need anything else, just differentiate it with respect to time
x(t)=x_0+v_0t+\tfrac{1}{2}at^2

Consider the case where the mass starts at rest, with x_0=0
 
semc said:
A 3kg block starts from rest at the top of a 30degree incline and slides a distance of 2m down the incline in 1.5s find the magnitude of the acceleration.

I have always though to find the acceleration you can just use x/(t*t) but i use this formula but i couldn't get the same as the book. is there something wrong with my understanding?
Write down the relevant equations.
Show your calculations.
 
RoyalCat said:
Your formula is incorrect.

You need to use the basic kinematic equation for motion under constant acceleration here. If you happen to need anything else, just differentiate it with respect to time
x(t)=x_0+v_0t+\tfrac{1}{2}at^2

Consider the case where the mass starts at rest, with x_0=0

can you explain why can't i just use x/(t*t) ?
 
x/(t*t) is the units of acceleration. For example meters per second squared

\frac {m/s^2}
 
Want to learn said:
x/(t*t) is the units of acceleration. For example meters per second squared

\frac {m/s^2}

It is not, however, the formula for the distance traveled. It may share the same units, but it's off by a factor of two.

Let's begin with the basics. We want to develop the kinematic equation for one dimensional motion under constant acceleration:

Our only givens are the initial position with respect to some origin, the initial velocities and accelerations with respect to a certain frame of reference, and the fact that the acceleration is constant.

a(t)=constant
Taking the indefinite integral over time:

v(t)=a\cdot t + C

C=v_0

v(t)=a\cdot t+v_0

We have now found an expression for the velocity as a function of time.

Taking the indefinite integral over time once more yields:

x(t)=\tfrac{1}{2}a\cdot t^2 +v_0\cdot t + C

C=x_0

x(t)=\tfrac{1}{2}a\cdot t^2 +v_0\cdot t + x_0

Q.E.D.

Just to elaborate on the point that has you confused though, differentiate the expression \tfrac{1}{2}at^2 with respect to time.
Remember, (ax^n)'=anx^{n-1}
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K