A brief history about development of String Theories

kiarash_niknejad2003
---------------------------------------------------------------------
References:

1) Green M., Schwarz J., Witten E., Superstring Theory Vol. 1,2, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987
2) S.Klimenko, V.Talanov, I.Nikitin ``Singularities on the world sheets of open relativistic strings'', Preprint IHEP 95-7, (Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia, 1995).
3) Introduction to Superstring Theory {http://www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0008017)
4) "String theory in a nutshell" written by (JM Figueroa-O'Farrill)
{http://www.strings.ph.qmw.ac.uk/WhatIs/Nutshell.html }


---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Good text, excet by the fuzzy concept of "Newtonian paradigm". One should clarify why it is a model, why it is from Newton, and how it does realte to strings after all.

Also, I'd like to include the recent (a couple years old by now) ideas of reusing the string in its original context, in QCD, and some more mentions to submilimeter dimensions etc.
 
You might also want to find some place in your text to note that string theory makes no predictions and there is not the slightest shred of experimental evidence for it after twenty years of work on the idea.

Or, alternately, you could explain how an increasingly large number of string theorists think that if string theory makes sense, it is completely vacuous, since the "landscape" of its 10^1000 or more solutions can give you any predictions about physics you want.
 
sub-mm dimensions?

Originally posted by arivero
*SNIP

... and some more mentions to submilimeter dimensions etc.
AFAIK there've been quite a few experiments done to look for deviations from inverse square law gravity (for example), down to ~1 micron. Have there been any results other than NULL? What other objectives have sub-mm experiments had?
 
social reinsertion

Perhaps a goal of submilimeter stuff, but also of Randrall Sundrum etc, was to bring back gradually into reality to the string theoreticians far far away the standard model. At the end the string theory could recover its original rule as a phase of SU(3)...
 
We do not condone plagiarism here on physicsforums. If you copy someone else's work, you must provide at least a link to the original, if not a full citation including the author's name.

For reference, the original text is available here:

http://www.strings.ph.qmw.ac.uk/WhatIs/Nutshell.html

and was written by JM Figueroa-O'Farrill.

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top