A caracterisation of f=0 by integrals

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrals
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
[SOLVED] A caracterisation of f=0 by integrals

Homework Statement


Does anyone know how to show, or know a book that proves the implication

[tex]\left(\int_0^1f\varphi = 0 \ \ \forall \varphi \in C_c^1([0,1])\right)\Rightarrow f=0[/tex]

for f in L²([0,1]) and where [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] denotes the C^1([0,1]) functions whose support is contained in (0,1).

Thanks.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the density of [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] in L^1 to obtained a sequence [itex]\varphi_n[/itex] that converges pointwise a.e. to the caracteristic function of [0,1] and then plugging-in the convergence theorems (Fatou, motone and dominated) but I eventually aknowledged that this would not work. Well, at least I got

[tex]\int_0^1f\leq 0[/tex]

out of Fatou.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to be clear, isn't [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] the set of compactly supported continuously differentiable funtions on [0,1]?

Anyway, here are some thoughts. Consider an open subset U of [0,1], whose characteristic function is [itex]\chi[/itex]. Get a sequence [itex]\{\varphi_n\}[/itex] in [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] that converges a.e. to [itex]\chi[/itex]. We can assume that [itex]M = \sup_n \| \varphi_n \|_\infty < \infty[/itex] (just construct them properly). So [itex]f\varphi_n \to f\chi[/itex] a.e., and [itex]\{f\varphi_n\}[/itex] is majorized by M|f|, which is integrable. Hence, by the dominated convergence theorem, [itex]\int_U f = 0[/itex] for all open subsets U of [0,1]. Now use the regularity of the Lebesgue measure to conclude that f=0 a.e.
 
morphism said:
Just to be clear, isn't [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] the set of compactly supported continuously differentiable funtions on [0,1]?

Dunno if this is standard convention or not but my professor uses [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] to denote the set of compactly supported continuously differentiable funtions on (0,1). So for instance, the characteristic function of [0,1] is not in [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] according to my prof.

morphism said:
Anyway, here are some thoughts. Consider an open subset U of [0,1], whose characteristic function is [itex]\chi[/itex]. Get a sequence [itex]\{\varphi_n\}[/itex] in [itex]C_c^1([0,1])[/itex] that converges a.e. to [itex]\chi[/itex]. We can assume that [itex]M = \sup_n \| \varphi_n \|_\infty < \infty[/itex] (just construct them properly). So [itex]f\varphi_n \to f\chi[/itex] a.e., and [itex]\{f\varphi_n\}[/itex] is majorized by M|f|, which is integrable. Hence, by the dominated convergence theorem, [itex]\int_U f = 0[/itex] for all open subsets U of [0,1]. Now use the regularity of the Lebesgue measure to conclude that f=0 a.e.

Neat argument!

Say, have you seen my other similar question ?

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=226834
 
Last edited: