Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around proving the reflection formula for the Dilogarithm, $$\text{Li}_2(x)$$, using its logarithmic integral representation. Participants explore the properties of the Dilogarithm and touch upon related concepts, including the Trilogarithm.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Post 1 presents the definition of the Dilogarithm and the reflection formula that needs to be proven.
- Post 2 expresses appreciation for the proof and notes the absence of a simple relation for the Trilogarithm.
- Post 3 mentions a quasi-reflection formula for the Trilogarithm, which involves $$\text{Li}_{3} \left( 1-\frac{1}{x} \right)$$.
- Post 4 reiterates the existence of a quasi-reflection formula for the Trilogarithm and reflects on the participant's familiarity with Trilogarithmic identities.
- Post 5 compliments the proof provided by another participant, indicating a positive reception of the work done.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express appreciation for the proof of the Dilogarithm reflection formula, but there is no consensus on the existence or simplicity of relations for the Trilogarithm, indicating multiple competing views on this topic.
Contextual Notes
The discussion includes references to specific mathematical identities and properties, but does not resolve the complexities surrounding the Trilogarithm or its relationships.