High School A Doubt from Halliday Resnick Krane

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the statement from Halliday Resnick Krane regarding the steeper descent of projectiles compared to their ascent due to drag force. It highlights that air resistance increases rapidly, leading to a sharp cut-off distance for thrown objects, such as paper wads or styrofoam peanuts, which fall almost vertically after reaching their peak. The behavior is explained through the equations of motion under linear drag, showing how velocity components change over time. The analysis emphasizes that gravity's effect becomes significant only after the initial speed dissipates due to drag. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending projectile motion in the presence of air resistance.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hello! In Chapter 4 of Halliday Resnick Krane on Pg. 73, they write “the descending motion is much steeper than the ascending motion” when discussing how the trajectory of a projectile changes when we consider drag force. Why is this statement true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could think about terminal velocity in the vertical direction compared to terminal velocity in the horizontal direction.

Edit: Alternately, you could take a bunch of pieces of paper wad them up into a balls and throw them into the air at a 45 degree angle, both softly and as hard as you can. What I would expect you to observe is that there is a fairly sharp cut-off distance beyond which you cannot throw and that the paper wads will reach this distance and then fall more or less vertically to the floor. This is typical behavior for quadratic drag. Air resistance gets very large, very fast. Gravity only becomes significant once the high initial speed has had time to dissipate.

Styrofoam packing "peanuts" work more dramatically than paper wads to demonstrate this behavior.
 
Last edited:
In the presence of linear drag, the equation of motion is
\begin{align*}
\dot{\mathbf{v}} + 2\gamma \mathbf{v} = \mathbf{g} \implies
\begin{cases}
\dot{v}_x + 2\gamma v_x &= 0 \\
\dot{v}_y + 2\gamma v_y &= -g
\end{cases}
\end{align*}A solution to the homogenous equation is ##e^{-2\gamma t}##. The forced equation for ##v_y## has a particular solution of ##-g/2\gamma##. The velocity is\begin{align*}
\mathbf{v}(t) = \begin{pmatrix} ae^{-2\gamma t} \\ be^{-2\gamma t} - \frac{g}{2\gamma} \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}If ##\mathbf{v}(0) = (v_{\mathrm{0x}}, v_{\mathrm{0y}})## then ##a = v_{\mathrm{0x}}## and also ##b = g/2\gamma + v_{\mathrm{0y}}##, so that\begin{align*}
\mathbf{v}(t) &= e^{-2\gamma t} \begin{pmatrix} v_{\mathrm{0x}} \\ v_{\mathrm{0y}} + \frac{g}{2\gamma}[1- e^{2\gamma t}] \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}Integrating, and putting ##\mathbf{x}(0) = 0##, gives\begin{align*}
\mathbf{x}(t) &= \frac{1}{2\gamma} (1- e^{-2\gamma t}) \begin{pmatrix} v_{\mathrm{0x}} \\ v_{\mathrm{0y}} + \frac{g}{2\gamma} \left[ 1 - \frac{2\gamma t}{1- e^{-2\gamma t}} \right] \end{pmatrix}
\end{align*}
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
25K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K