Is Halliday/Resnick: "Fundamentals of Physics"? good for me?

  • Context: Intro Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sidgupta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the suitability of Halliday/Resnick's "Fundamentals of Physics" for a high school student preparing for advanced studies in physics and calculus. Participants explore whether the book aligns with the student's current knowledge and background, and they also consider alternative texts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if the student is learning calculus well, Halliday/Resnick would be appropriate, especially if an older edition is chosen for cost reasons.
  • Another participant notes that seeing applications in the physics text can aid in understanding calculus, highlighting that many university students take physics and calculus concurrently.
  • A participant shares their positive experience with Randall Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers," stating it is also a good option for the student's background.
  • One contributor mentions their extensive experience with Halliday/Resnick and expresses confidence in its effectiveness, while also acknowledging Knight as a solid alternative.
  • Another participant reflects on their own positive experience with Halliday/Resnick during high school, indicating it provided a strong foundation for university studies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that Halliday/Resnick is suitable for the student, but there are multiple views regarding the potential effectiveness of Randall Knight's book as an alternative. The discussion remains open regarding the best choice between the two texts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the texts discussed, which may influence their recommendations. There is also an implicit assumption that the student's calculus understanding will be sufficient to engage with the physics material.

sidgupta
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello there!

I'm a 17 year old high school student entering grade 12 in September, and I'm looking for something to quench my thirst for physics during my summer break. I have 6 weeks of vacation at the moment, and am currently teaching myself how to do calculus with hopes of working through AP calculus BC books. I wanted a calculus-based physics book that I can read alongside with what I'm studying, so I can hopefully learn more about physics, and apply the mathematics I've learned in a practical use. I was considering Halliday/Resnick: "Fundamentals of Physics", as it is calculus based, but I'm wondering if it's right for me.
My most recent physics course was grade 11, in which we covered kinematics, forces, waves and sound, electricity and magnetism, and work and energy. As for calculus, I will be going through mostly the grade 12 material involving geometric and Cartesian vectors, derivatives, rates of change, exponential and logarithmic functions, and lines and planes, which are all at a high school level.

I was wondering, if I were to purchase this book for my own reading, would I be able to understand the concepts discussed with my current knowledge and background? If not, what other books would you recommend to suit my current situation?

Thanks so much!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: The Bill
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are learning calculus well, then yes. Get an older edition of Halliday & Resnick, since they can be had for very little from online stores such as Amazon and Abe Books. Just make sure you get the same edition for each of volumes I and II.

Also, seeing applications in the physics text can help you to understand the calculus as you are learning it. Many university students take physics I concurrently with as calculus I, seeing both treated at university level for the first time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sidgupta
The Bill said:
If you are learning calculus well, then yes. Get an older edition of Halliday & Resnick, since they can be had for very little from online stores such as Amazon and Abe Books. Just make sure you get the same edition for each of volumes I and II.

Also, seeing applications in the physics text can help you to understand the calculus as you are learning it. Many university students take physics I concurrently with as calculus I, seeing both treated at university level for the first time.

Hey! Thanks so much for the reply! I was also told that Randall Knight's "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" was also a good book for my current situation. Do you know anything about that, and what do you think of it?
 
I used RH as a undergraduate and taught from it as a graduate student throughout the 1970's. RH is hard to beat.
I recently looked at a copy of Knight that I bought. Of course I do not know as much about it as RH, but I also felt Knight was pretty good.
I do not think you can go wrong with either one. Seems like you have adequate background for either.
 
Yeah, HR book is very good in your situation, i used to study physics form there while in high school, the background that HR gived to me helped me a lot later in university :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K