A First Course in String Theory - Quick Calculation 2.5

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves identifying the resulting space from a specific identification in the plane (x,y) as described in Zwiebach's "A First Course in String Theory." The identification is given by (x,y) → (x+2πR,y+2πR), prompting discussion on the nature of the resulting space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the identification and its relationship to known geometrical constructs, such as circles and tori. There are questions about how to combine boundaries and define a fundamental domain under this identification.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints and alternative methods for approaching the problem, while others express frustration with external links and seek clarification on the identification's effects on compactness and dimensionality.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the Cartesian plane's compactness under certain identifications, and the discussion highlights the lack of a limited fundamental domain for the given identification, suggesting that x and y alter together in a way that affects the overall structure of the space.

adartsesirhc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Zwiebach's A First Course in String Theory
Quick Calculation 2.5: Consider the plane (x,y) with the identification

(x,y)\rightarrow (x+2\pi R,y+2\pi R).

What is the resulting space?

Homework Equations


A one dimensional line with identification x\rightarrow x+2\pi R is a circle.

A plane with identifications
(x,y)\rightarrow (x+2\pi R,y)
(x,y)\rightarrow (x,y+2\pi R)
is a torus.

The Attempt at a Solution


The identification is just the combination of both of the torus identifications... but how would I join two boundaries with a single identification? And what would be the fundamental domain? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm... I clicked on the link, but it appears to be invalid.
 
It may be easier to think of it this way: (x,y) \rightarrow (x,y) + 2\pi R (1,1).
 
adartsesirhc said:
Hmm... I clicked on the link, but it appears to be invalid.

That's strange. I made the link on my computer at work, and it works here at home.

Another method: try coordinates x' = \left(x + y \right)/\sqrt{2} and y' = \left(x - y \right)/\sqrt{2}.
 
Dear adartsesirhc, I wish I could do some help. I'm very angry with the administrator's slow permission, and I have to repost via quick reply.

As you know, the Caretessian plane of $xoy$ is compact for the identification:
$$
x\sim x+2\pi R
y\sim y+2\pi R
$$
where x and y vary independently and individually, and the fundamental domain is
$$
x\in (0, 2\pi R), y\in (0, 2\pi R).
$$
However, for the identification of
$$
(x,y)\sim (x+2\pi R, y+2\pi R),
$$
the plane will no longer be compact. And because $x$ and $y$ alter together by the vector $\lambda(2\pi R, 2\pi R)$, $\lambda \in R$, there's no limited fundamental domain which could generate the 2-dimensional space via the identification.

In another sense, nevertheless, we could also attain a generalized fundamental domain. Firstly set the 2D Cartessian coordinates on the plane, with pionts $A(-\pi R, 0)$, $A'(0, -\pi R)$, $C(0, \pi R)$, $C'(\pi R, 0)$. see figure 1:

(figure 1)

and the so-called domain is the space between the lines $x+y=-\pi R$ and $x+y=\pi R$ and goes to infinity along the line. Notice that although the domain is confined between the two lines, there's no constraints along the lines, so the it is an infinite band.

Now, we could glue the boundary lines of $A-A'$ with $C-C'$, see figure2:

(figure 2)

All in all, we should notice that, for the identification of $(x,y)\sim (x+2\pi R, y+2\pi R)$, the 2D space is no longer compact due to co-movement of x and y.

As a natural extension, for n-dimensional space located $(x_1, x_2, x_3, ..., x_n)$, if the space is to be compact, the identifications for each variable should be independent to one another. Only in this way, can a limited domain exist to cover the whole space via the transformation of identifications.

Sorry that I couldnot get the two figures uploaded, please contact tianwj1@gmail.com for them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K