A football team consists of 20 defensive and 20 offensive players

  • Thread starter Thread starter mynameisfunk
  • Start date Start date
mynameisfunk
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, test review problem, I have the solution but having a very hard time wrapping my head around it.
Q: A football team consists of 20 defensive and 20 offensive players. The players are
to be paired to form roommates and the pairing is done at random.
(a) What is the probability that there are no offensive-defensive pairs?
(b) And that there are exactly 4 offensive-defensive pairs?

A: (a) I know that there are \frac{40!}{2!^20)} total ways to pick pairs. Then we have \frac{20!}{2!^10} total ways that the offensive (or defensive) players can be lined up. Soo... without looking at my solution, my best attempt is \frac{20!^2}{40!} Having squared the numerator and simplifying. Reasoning was that the multiplication rule held for the total ways offensives can pair and total way defensives can pair over the total amount of possible pairs.

B: (b) Again, the total possible pairings are \frac{40!}{2!^(20)}. Now, we have 20C4 ways each group can pick their 4 people to be paired. And \frac{8!}{2!^4} ways to pair these guys up. Now for the rest of one particular group we have \frac{16!}{2!^8} ways for them to pair up, so since there are 2 of these, we square this. My final answer: 20C4\times\frac{16!^22!^2}{40!}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


are you sure about a) ?

have you considered the both the ordering of different pairs & the order within a pair does not change the outcome... though your tex is a little difficult to read

to explain, consider 1234, selecting numbers at random, the following pairings are all equivalent
12 34, 34 12
21 34, 43 12
12 43, 34 21
21 43, 43 21
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top