Good Books on Tensors: Recommendations for Undergraduates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on recommended books for understanding tensors at the undergraduate level. Key suggestions include "Tensor Calculus" by J.L. Synge and A. Schild, which is published by Dover, making it an affordable option. For those interested in general relativity, textbooks such as "Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics" by Schutz and "Elements de calcul tensoriel" by Pavel Grinfeld are also highlighted. Additionally, the importance of differential geometry in understanding tensors is emphasized, with references to Spivak's "Calculus on Manifolds" and Reyer Sjamaar's lecture notes on manifolds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with linear algebra and multilinear tensor theory
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity principles
  • Awareness of tensor notation and its implications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Calculus on Manifolds" by Michael Spivak for foundational differential geometry
  • Explore Reyer Sjamaar's "Manifolds and Differential Forms" lecture notes for advanced concepts
  • Read "Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics" by Schutz for practical applications of tensors
  • Investigate "Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists" by Fecko for a physicist's perspective on tensors
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate students in mathematics, physics, and engineering who seek a solid understanding of tensors and their applications in various fields.

Wrichik Basu
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,180
Reaction score
2,690
I need a good book on tensors, so that I can understand and get good hold of the topic. Can anyone recommend me a good book, like one used in undergraduate level?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you need a book for mathematicians, a book for physicists, or a book for engineers?
 
Demystifier said:
Do you need a book for mathematicians, a book for physicists, or a book for engineers?

Physics.
 
Wrichik Basu said:
Physics.
Then try J.L. Synge, A. Schild, Tensor Calculus.
It's published by Dover, so it's probably cheap.

Alternatively, if you need it for general relativity, any textbook on GR has a chapter or two on tensors.
 
Demystifier said:
Then try J.L. Synge, A. Schild, Tensor Calculus.
It's published by Dover, so it's probably cheap.

Alternatively, if you need it for general relativity, any textbook on GR has a chapter or two on tensors.

I actually want to learn the basics of the topic and understand it thoroughly. Will surely try your first book. Thanks.
 
Tensor is an object of differential geometry. Learn differential geometry, you can not understand tensors independently on differential geometry of manifolds
 
zwierz said:
Tensor is an object of differential geometry. Learn differential geometry, you can not understand tensors independently on differential geometry of manifolds

Well then, give me a book on differential geometry.
 
zwierz said:
Tensor is an object of differential geometry. Learn differential geometry, you can not understand tensors independently on differential geometry of manifolds
It depends on the perspective. The differential-geometry aspect of tensors is indeed essential in general relativity, but perhaps not so much in theory of elasticity. In the latter case, the algebraic aspect of tensors is perhaps sufficient.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: smodak and Wrichik Basu
You can find lots of good basic material by googling "linear algebra multilinear tensor"

To go from tensor algebra to tensor differential geomtry, you can try Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds and Reyer Sjamaar's Manifolds and Differential Forms lecture notes http://www.math.cornell.edu/~sjamaar/manifolds/.

Two books I really like are Crampin and Pirani's Applicable Differential Geometry and Fecko's Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists. They give the translation between the mathematical notation using differential geometric objects and physicist's index gymnastics.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #10
atyy said:
You can find lots of good basic material by googling "linear algebra multilinear tensor"

To go from tensor algebra to tensor differential geomtry, you can try Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds and Reyer Sjamaar's Manifolds and Differential Forms lecture notes http://www.math.cornell.edu/~sjamaar/manifolds/.

Two books I really like are Crampin and Pirani's Applicable Differential Geometry and Fecko's Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists. They give the translation between the mathematical notation using differential geometric objects and physicist's index gymnastics.

Of course I can Google, but there is a difference in getting books from authorized sources rather than unauthorised ones.
 
  • #12
Schutz, Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. An easy read.
Wasserman, Tensors and Manifolds is a very thorough development of the subject.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #13
Wrichik Basu said:
I need a good book on tensors, so that I can understand and get good hold of the topic. Can anyone recommend me a good book, like one used in undergraduate level?
I really like Pavel Grinfeld's book and the accompanying free lectures (with links to solutions etc.).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu and Demystifier
  • #14
It is in french " Elements de calcul tensoriel '' , Lichnerowicz.

Ssnow
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
  • #15
smodak said:
I really like Pavel Grinfeld's book and the accompanying free lectures (with links to solutions etc.).
Hm, the notation in Chpt. 6 where he finally introduces tensor components (not as claimed tensors, but that's a common practice among physicists), is dangerous at best. One should really be very careful in not only make a thorough distinction in the vertical position of indices (indicating whether one has co- or contravariant components of tensors) but also the horizontal position. Otherwise it can come to ambiguities leading to great confusion. Also the prime indicating the other basis to which the components refer should be on the symbol, not at the indices. So Eq. (6.1) should in fact read
$$T_j'=T_i {J^i}_j.$$
With this little more effort in notational clarity, which is a bit cumbersome (particularly with a bad handwriting like mine ;-)), pays off by being much more safe against confusing oneself in calculations with many indices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
  • #16
vanhees71 said:
Hm, the notation in Chpt. 6 where he finally introduces tensor components (not as claimed tensors, but that's a common practice among physicists), is dangerous at best. One should really be very careful in not only make a thorough distinction in the vertical position of indices (indicating whether one has co- or contravariant components of tensors) but also the horizontal position. Otherwise it can come to ambiguities leading to great confusion. Also the prime indicating the other basis to which the components refer should be on the symbol, not at the indices. So Eq. (6.1) should in fact read
$$T_j'=T_i {J^i}_j.$$
With this little more effort in notational clarity, which is a bit cumbersome (particularly with a bad handwriting like mine ;-)), pays off by being much more safe against confusing oneself in calculations with many indices.
So, what do you suggest as a good introductory tensor analysis book for a beginner?
 
  • #17
That's a difficult question. Usually textbooks on general relativity have good introductions to tensor analysis, e.g., Landau, Lifshitz, vol. 2 or the book by Stephani; for the modern way using Cartan calculus and differential forms, Misner, Thorne, Wheeler.
 
  • #18
Ssnow said:
It is in french " Elements de calcul tensoriel '' , Lichnerowicz.

Ssnow

It has been translated for the 1st time in English 55 years ago.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ssnow

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
623
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
692
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K