- 2,180
- 2,690
I need a good book on tensors, so that I can understand and get good hold of the topic. Can anyone recommend me a good book, like one used in undergraduate level?
This discussion centers on recommended books for understanding tensors at the undergraduate level. Key suggestions include "Tensor Calculus" by J.L. Synge and A. Schild, which is published by Dover, making it an affordable option. For those interested in general relativity, textbooks such as "Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics" by Schutz and "Elements de calcul tensoriel" by Pavel Grinfeld are also highlighted. Additionally, the importance of differential geometry in understanding tensors is emphasized, with references to Spivak's "Calculus on Manifolds" and Reyer Sjamaar's lecture notes on manifolds.
PREREQUISITESUndergraduate students in mathematics, physics, and engineering who seek a solid understanding of tensors and their applications in various fields.
Demystifier said:Do you need a book for mathematicians, a book for physicists, or a book for engineers?
Then try J.L. Synge, A. Schild, Tensor Calculus.Wrichik Basu said:Physics.
Demystifier said:Then try J.L. Synge, A. Schild, Tensor Calculus.
It's published by Dover, so it's probably cheap.
Alternatively, if you need it for general relativity, any textbook on GR has a chapter or two on tensors.
zwierz said:Tensor is an object of differential geometry. Learn differential geometry, you can not understand tensors independently on differential geometry of manifolds
It depends on the perspective. The differential-geometry aspect of tensors is indeed essential in general relativity, but perhaps not so much in theory of elasticity. In the latter case, the algebraic aspect of tensors is perhaps sufficient.zwierz said:Tensor is an object of differential geometry. Learn differential geometry, you can not understand tensors independently on differential geometry of manifolds
atyy said:You can find lots of good basic material by googling "linear algebra multilinear tensor"
To go from tensor algebra to tensor differential geomtry, you can try Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds and Reyer Sjamaar's Manifolds and Differential Forms lecture notes http://www.math.cornell.edu/~sjamaar/manifolds/.
Two books I really like are Crampin and Pirani's Applicable Differential Geometry and Fecko's Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists. They give the translation between the mathematical notation using differential geometric objects and physicist's index gymnastics.
Wrichik Basu said:Of course I can Google, but there is a difference in getting books from authorized sources rather than unauthorised ones.
Hm, the notation in Chpt. 6 where he finally introduces tensor components (not as claimed tensors, but that's a common practice among physicists), is dangerous at best. One should really be very careful in not only make a thorough distinction in the vertical position of indices (indicating whether one has co- or contravariant components of tensors) but also the horizontal position. Otherwise it can come to ambiguities leading to great confusion. Also the prime indicating the other basis to which the components refer should be on the symbol, not at the indices. So Eq. (6.1) should in fact readsmodak said:
So, what do you suggest as a good introductory tensor analysis book for a beginner?vanhees71 said:Hm, the notation in Chpt. 6 where he finally introduces tensor components (not as claimed tensors, but that's a common practice among physicists), is dangerous at best. One should really be very careful in not only make a thorough distinction in the vertical position of indices (indicating whether one has co- or contravariant components of tensors) but also the horizontal position. Otherwise it can come to ambiguities leading to great confusion. Also the prime indicating the other basis to which the components refer should be on the symbol, not at the indices. So Eq. (6.1) should in fact read
$$T_j'=T_i {J^i}_j.$$
With this little more effort in notational clarity, which is a bit cumbersome (particularly with a bad handwriting like mine ;-)), pays off by being much more safe against confusing oneself in calculations with many indices.
Ssnow said:It is in french " Elements de calcul tensoriel '' , Lichnerowicz.
Ssnow