A Leaning Plank. Find where it looses contact.

  • Thread starter Thread starter warjunkie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contact
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics problem of a uniform plank leaning against a wall, specifically determining the height at which the plank loses contact with the wall when released. Participants analyze forces acting on the plank, including gravitational force (mg), normal forces from the wall (Nw) and ground (Ng), and the relationship between vertical (ay) and horizontal (ax) accelerations. The consensus is that the plank loses contact when the normal force from the wall becomes zero, which occurs at a specific angle, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the height at which the plank loses contact is 2h/3.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and torque
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in mechanics
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Lagrangian mechanics in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between angular velocity and linear acceleration
  • Explore the concept of normal forces in static and dynamic systems
  • Investigate the use of conservation of energy in solving mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of rigid bodies in motion.

  • #31
Abdul Quadeer said:
Let the length of the plank be 2l (for simplicity) and let it make an angle θ with the horizontal when normal force by the vertical wall is 0.

1. Energy Conservation-

ω2 = 3g/2l (sinΦ - sinθ), where Φ is the initial angle of the base with horizontal.

Correct so far, but I but I can not follow you after. I write the details to get the angular acceleration

The angular acceleration is obtained by derivation of

ω2=3g/(2L) (sinΦ - sinθ). *

2ω dω/dt=-3g/(2L)(cosθ)ω --->dω/dt=-3g/(4L)cosθ. **

N=0 means that the horizontal acceleration of the centre of mass is zero. The x coordinate of the CM is xcm=L(cosθ), vcm=-Lω(sinθ) and

acm=-L*(ω2cosθ +dω/dt sinθ ).***

acm=0 means that dω/dt =-ω2cotθ, the same you got.

Substituting (*) for ω2 and (**) for dω/dt in (***) for the horizontal acceleration, you get the angle when the contact is lost.

I do not understand the signs in your torque method. Show what you consider positive directions. Also, dω/dt is missing from your equation for N2. And you got an expression (*) for ω2 already, what are these different new ones?

ehild
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ehild said:
Substituting (*) for ω2 and (**) for dω/dt in (***) for the horizontal acceleration, you get the angle when the contact is lost.

No need of any Langrangian or torque equations?

ehild said:
I do not understand the signs in your torque method. Show what you consider positive directions. Also, dω/dt is missing from your equation for N2. And you got an expression (*) for ω2 already, what are these different new ones?

ehild

I took upward direction positive. dw/dt = α in my equations.
I solved for α from the torque equation and Newton's law to find one more expression for α and hence ω.

btw I got the height as 2h/3 not h/3
 
  • #33
Abdul Quadeer said:
No need of any Langrangian or torque equations?

No need any of them, just get the accelerations dω/dt and ax by derivation with respect to time.

Abdul Quadeer said:
I took upward direction positive. dw/dt = α in my equations.
I solved for α from the torque equation and Newton's law to find one more expression for α and hence ω.


Check the signs in your equations. But the torque method is quite complicated.

Abdul Quadeer said:
btw I got the height as 2h/3 not h/3

2h/3 is correct. Great work!

First I wrote up the equations of motion for the translation of the CM and for the rotation around it. It was quite complicated. Then I used the Lagrangian to find the equation of motion in terms of the angle. But I had to solve a differential equation to get the angular speed. The easiest way was using conservation of energy.

ehild
 
  • #34
Thanks to all for this wonderful effort. I am really thankful.Never could have possibly got to that without your help.
Special thanks to ehild.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K