A line charge with variable charge density

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a line charge with a variable charge density described by the equation λ=4 λnot((1-x)/2L), where λnot is a constant and the rod has a length of L. Participants are tasked with calculating the net charge of the rod and determining the electric field at the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to integrate the charge density to find the net charge and express the electric field in terms of the charge density. There are questions about the limits of integration and the correct form of the charge density equation. Some participants suggest re-evaluating the integration process and the treatment of variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various attempts to clarify the integration process and the application of the charge density. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of the charge density and the integration limits. There is no explicit consensus yet, but multiple interpretations and methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the expression for charge density and the integration variable. There is also mention of the need to use LaTeX for clearer communication of mathematical expressions.

nilesthebrave
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A line charge in the x directio has a variable charge density given by the equation λ=4 λnot((1-x)/2L), where λnot is a constant. The rod has a length of L.

i)What is the net charge of the rod? Hint-the net charge is calculated by integrating the charge density with respect to x.
ii)Show that the electric field at the origin is given as E=-((2kQ)/L^2) (1-ln2)i

Homework Equations



Q=∫λrdx

Ex=(kλdx)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Well I couldn't find much about something like this, so I kind of winged it and have no idea if what I did was even partially right but here we go.

i)Q=∫λrdx
=4λnot∫(1-(x/2L))/L^2 dx
=4λ (x-4L)/4L^2

Q=(λx-4L)/L^2

Again I'm not sure I'm doing that right, but it's what made sense to me.

ii)dEx=((kλdx)/r^2) (x/r)

Ex=kλx∫dx/r^3

Ex=kλx[-1/2r^2]

And now I have no idea what I'm doing...
 

Attachments

  • variable line charge.png
    variable line charge.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 614
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello nilesthebrave
i)Q=∫λrdx
=4λnot∫(1-(x/2L))/L^2 dx
=4λ (x-4L)/4L^2

Q=(λx-4L)/L^2
Think again .L is a constant all by itself and your integrated product seems to include the variable.By your picture the rod extends from x=L to x=2L right? Does that give you an idea of the limits of integration? I think Q=∫λ(r)dx is what you meant in your solution.

dEx=((kλdx)/r^2) (x/r)

Ex=kλx∫dx/r^3

Ex=kλx[-1/2r^2]
Think of an element small enough (dx) on the line rod at a distance x from the origin .It acts as a point charge (approximately).What is the charge on this length of element ?(assuming λ remains the same as for the distance x along this element)What is the elemental magnitude(dE) of the field due to such a charge at given distance? Then sum up those contributions by integration.You should be getting an expression for total electric field.The sign on the final expression might give you an idea on the nature of charge?

Does this help?
regards
Yukoel
 
Ok, let's try this out:

Q=∫(from x=L to x=2L) (4λnot(1-(x/2L))rdx
=4λnot∫(1-(x/2L)rdx
=4λnot[x-1/2x^2]r^2/2)from L to 2L
=4λnot[2L-L^2)-(L-L/2)]
=(3L/2-L^2)4λnot

Is that closer to being correct?

Also, I'm still not quite sure what to do with part ii. Is how I'm starting off at least right?
 
nilesthebrave said:
Ok, let's try this out:

Q=∫(from x=L to x=2L) (4λnot(1-(x/2L))rdx
=4λnot∫(1-(x/2L)rdx
=4λnot[x-1/2x^2]r^2/2)from L to 2L
=4λnot[2L-L^2)-(L-L/2)]
=(3L/2-L^2)4λnot

Is that closer to being correct?

Also, I'm still not quite sure what to do with part ii. Is how I'm starting off at least right?

It would be much better if you use LaTeX to write the equations. Its difficult to follow what you have written. In the question, you have mentioned that [tex]λ=4λ_o\frac{1-x}{2L}[/tex] but in the attempt you use:
[tex]λ=4λ_o(1-\frac{x}{2L})[/tex]
Which one of them is the expression for λ? Also, what is the meaning of the bold "r" you have in your attempt.

As Yukoel said, think of a very very tiny part dx and find its charge. Integrate the expression from L to 2L to obtain the total charge.

EDIT: Seems like that you have to use the latter expression for λ. I calculated the electric field using the second expression and found the electric field as given in the question.
 
Last edited:
nilesthebrave said:
Ok, let's try this out:

Q=∫(from x=L to x=2L) (4λnot(1-(x/2L))rdx
=4λnot∫(1-(x/2L)rdx
=4λnot[x-1/2x^2]r^2/2)from L to 2L
=4λnot[2L-L^2)-(L-L/2)]
=(3L/2-L^2)4λnot

Is that closer to being correct?

Also, I'm still not quite sure what to do with part ii. Is how I'm starting off at least right?

Hello nilesthebrave,
Why the bold r here?Are you trying to treat charge as a vector?Your integration involves x as a variable so why would you integrate r instead of it ?(ignoring the fact that vectors are not integrated directly in case r was a vector)You need to recheck your integral again.It should be simply ∫λ(x)dx =Q (limits as said earlier)
And as pranav-arora quoted the correct expression for charge is
[tex]λ=4λ_o(1-\frac{x}{2L})[/tex] (satisfies dimensions)
For the second part first of all calculate the charge on an elemental length dx using charge density.Treat it as a point charge and find the magnitude of the field created on the origin.In your attempt you have directly shifted λ out of your equation though it is a function of x.The basic formula you use i.e.
dEx=((kλdx)/x^2)
sounds fine to me.(By the looks of your method I think that you have assumed some oblique orientation of your rod in space though your uploaded picture depicts it lying on x axis. )You need to recheck your integral here too.
Hoping this helps.
regards
Yukoel
 
Alright I think I FINALLY got all it all. Thank you very much for all of your help. I have a habit of overthinking problems and spending far longer on them than I should. So thanks for giving my brain an enema.

Also, how do I use this LaTex, I think it'd be far more convenient for everyone if I started using it :-p

Is it just clicking the Sigma up top?
[itex]m_{n}\ =\ 1.67492716(13)\ \times\ 10^{-27}\ kg[/itex]
 
Awesome, thank you very much. It's bookmarked for when I inevitably become stuck on another Physics 2 problem :p
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
901
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K