A mass sliding down the inclined plane -- Will it stop?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass sliding down an inclined plane, focusing on the forces acting on the mass, particularly the normal force and friction. Participants are exploring the relationship between the coefficient of friction and the angle of the incline.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the equations of motion for the mass on the incline, questioning the assumptions about the normal force and its relationship to the weight of the mass. There are discussions about the work done by friction and gravity, and whether they are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning each other's assumptions about the normal force and its calculation. Some have acknowledged misunderstandings and are attempting to clarify the relationship between the coefficient of friction and the incline angle. There is no explicit consensus, but various interpretations and approaches are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack sufficient information, particularly regarding the coefficient of friction changing after half the length of the ramp. There is an emphasis on understanding the normal force in different scenarios, such as varying incline angles.

rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
Homework Statement
The upper half of an inclined plane with inclination ##\phi## is perfectly smooth,while the lower half is rough. A body starting from rest at the top will again come to rest at the bottom, if the coefficient of friction for the lower half is
Relevant Equations
##Fnet=ma##
##v^2=u^2+2as##
For lower half ,$$Fnet=-\mu F_N+mg\sin \phi$$
For upper half,
$$v^2=u^2+2as$$ (s is half of the total slant distance)
$$v^2=0+2\frac{mg\sin \phi}ms$$
$$v=\sqrt{2g\sin \phi s}$$
again for lower half,
$$v^2=u^2+2as$$
$$0=2g\sin \phi s+2\frac{-\mu F_N+mg\sin \phi}ms$$
$$\mu=\frac{2gm\sin \phi}{F_N}$$
$$\mu=2\sin \phi$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rudransh verma said:
$$0=2g\sin \phi s+2\frac{-\mu F_N+mg\sin \phi}ms$$
$$\mu=\frac{2gm\sin \phi}{F_N}$$
$$\mu=2\sin \phi$$
You cannot get rid of ##F_N## in the denominator by setting it equal to the weight. What is ##F_N##?
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
You cannot get rid of ##F_N## in the denominator by setting it equal to the weight. What is ##F_N##?
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg. I don't think i have done anything wrong here.
 
Last edited:
rudransh verma said:
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg. I don't think i have done anything wrong here.
Why will it be equal to weight? Have you checked the limiting cases such as a vertical wall?
 
rudransh verma said:
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg. I don't think i have done anything wrong here.
If it makes sense to you that the normal force is equal to the weight no matter what the angle of the incline, leave it at that but it is wrong. I will not suggest a method for finding the correct normal force because you have ignored such advice by numerous people on numerous occasions in other threads. I am out of this particular thread.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS, Doc Al and jbriggs444
rudransh verma said:
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg. I don't think i have done anything wrong here.
Only on level ground.
 
rudransh verma said:
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg.
What do you think the word "normal" means here? Have you tried solving for the normal force?
 
rudransh verma said:
Normal force which will be equal to weight mg. I don't think i have done anything wrong here.
You have an impressive rate of posting to this forum. Unfortunately it does not seem to be leaving you time to think in between.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: rudransh verma
haruspex said:
You have an impressive rate of posting to this forum. Unfortunately it does not seem to be leaving you time to think in between.
##F_N=mg\cos \phi##. By mistake I did that. ##\mu= 2\tan \phi## is coming.
 
  • #10
Would the work done by friction be equal to the work done by gravity?
 
  • #11
valenumr said:
Would the work done by friction be equal to the work done by gravity?
Equal in magnitude, opposite sign.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: valenumr
  • #12
haruspex said:
Yes.
Thanks. I would assume that would be the way to solve it, but not enough information given.
 
  • #13
valenumr said:
Thanks. I would assume that would be the way to solve it, but not enough information given.
Really? Looks enough to me.
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Really? Looks enough to me.
Oh... I misunderstood the question. It is trying to solve for the coefficient of friction vs the angle of the ramp, given that the coefficient changes from zero to some value after half the length of the ramp?
 
  • #15
valenumr said:
Oh... I misunderstood the question. It is trying to solve for the coefficient of friction vs the angle of the ramp, given that the coefficient changes from zero to some value after half the length of the ramp?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: valenumr

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K