A microwave oven of mass 13.0kg is pushed a distance 8.80m up a ramp

AI Thread Summary
To analyze the work done on a microwave oven pushed up a ramp, the kinetic energy theorem is applicable, specifically using the equation Δ(KE) = W_net. The work done can be calculated by considering the forces involved, including friction, which opposes motion and thus is treated as a negative value in calculations. The net work is determined by subtracting the work done against friction and gravitational forces from the applied force. Friction will decrease the kinetic energy of the system, as it acts against the direction of motion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately calculating the change in kinetic energy.
nouvelague
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A microwave oven of mass 13.0 kg
is pushed a distance 8.80 m
up the sloping surface of a loading ramp inclined at an angle of 38.3 ∘
above the horizontal, by a constant force F⃗
with a magnitude 150 N
and acting parallel to the ramp. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the oven and the ramp is 0.240.


Part D
Use your answers to parts (A), (B), and (C) to calculate the increase in the oven's kinetic energy.
Take the free fall acceleration to be 9.80 m/s2
. Express your answer using two significant figures.
Relevant Equations
W = change in KE
-change in U + Wfriction = change in KE
For this one, am i supposed to use W = change in KE where i calculate work as ((F - friction - mgsintheta) times d), or am i supposed to do the change in -mgh plus Wfriction = change in KE (where if it is in this case, is the friction going to be a negative number?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since friction is involved, you are supposed to use the kinetic energy theorem $$\Delta (KE)=W_{\text{net}}.$$ I assume that in the previous parts you have calculated all the works that are needed.
 
nouvelague said:
where if it is in this case, is the friction going to be a negative number?
Will the friction occurring here increase or decrease the kinetic energy?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top