A plane flying at 220m s-1 at a height of 300m

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving a plane flying at a constant speed of 220 m/s at a height of 300 m. The pilot drops a food package to hit a target below, leading to questions about the timing and distance of the drop.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the time it takes for the package to fall to the ground and how this relates to the horizontal distance traveled by the plane. There are differing interpretations of the initial conditions, particularly regarding the vertical velocity of the package at the moment of release.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, with some participants suggesting that the time to release the package should be based on the horizontal distance to the target, while others emphasize the vertical fall time. There is no explicit consensus yet, but various lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the assumptions about the initial vertical velocity of the package and how it affects the timing of the drop. The discussion also highlights the distinction between the time to hit the ground and the time to release the package before reaching the target.

Nubcake
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
This is a question about projectiles

A plane flying at a constant speed of 220m s-1 at a height of 300m. The pilot drops a food package to hit a certain target.

a)How long (in time) before passing over the target should the pilot release the package?
b)How long in metres would that be?



S = ut + at^2/2

This is not my attempt at the question but someone else's but I don't trust his answer as I'm unsure about it although it looks right.


S = 300
a = 9.8
u = 220

300 = 220t + 9.8t^2/2
4.9t^2 + 220t - 300 = 0

After solving using the q. Formula he got t as 1.45 s

b) S = ut
S = 220x1.45
S = 319m


Is his answer to this question right? It sure looks like it to me but I don't understand why , the package's initial vertical velocity is 0 so its horizontal velocity 220 m s-1? Or is that the plane's?
1.45s before they pass over the target they should release the package? What would happen if they released it just as they were over the target?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a)
S = ut + (at^2)/2

S = 300
a = 9.8
u = 0 <----because VERTICAL initial velocity is 0 (unless your plane is flying towards the ground...)

300=0.5(9.8)t^2
t=7.82s (3 s.f)

b)s=ut
s=220x7.82
s=1720.4m
 
cheahchungyin said:
a)
S = ut + (at^2)/2

S = 300
a = 9.8
u = 0 <----because VERTICAL initial velocity is 0 (unless your plane is flying towards the ground...)

300=0.5(9.8)t^2
t=7.82s (3 s.f)

b)s=ut
s=220x7.82
s=1720.4m

I thought this was this answer too , are you sure that it's right can anyone else verify?
 
I'm 90.5% sure about it haha :p
 
A detailed explanation of why should help me understand , I don't know who is right about it now.
 
What detailed explanation do you need? The vertical velocity is indeed zero initially, which gives a little less than 8 s of free fall.
 
When dealing with 2D vectors like this, you can look at each direction separately.
The vertical component is not affected by the horizontal component which is directly perpendicular to it.
 
voko said:
What detailed explanation do you need? The vertical velocity is indeed zero initially, which gives a little less than 8 s of free fall.

Yes I know that it is 0 but is that what the question is asking ? To me it says how long before they reach the target should they release the package , doesn't it mean that it's not falling straight down as if from rest (where both initial horizontal and vertical are 0) but 'diagonally'?
 
ya its diagonally. but the 220ms-1 only affect how fast it moves horizontally.
The diagonal component can be seen separated as vertical and horizontal
 
  • #10
It may be moving diagonally, but the gravity affects only the vertical component of the velocity, so you can solve for it independently.
 
  • #11
Sorry but I still don't understand , I also got 7.8 seconds when I worked it out but wasn't the time taken for the package to hit the ground ? Surely that's different from the time they have to release it before they fly over the target?
 
  • #12
Why is that different and especially why is that SURELY different?
 
  • #13
Hard to phrase now that I think it , the time it takes to hit the ground is 7.8 seconds (apparently) if they released it anywhere because the initial vertical velocity would still be 0 . The time before they should release it before they pass over the target since they are traveling at 220 m s-1 , do you see what I mean by that

Is the packages horizontal velocity 220m s-1?
 
  • #14
Ya, you think we should find the time taken to reach the horizontal distance right? :)
You have to imagine here. Since in reality the object is dropping diagonally, it is falling vertically and horizontally simultaneously. The time taken to reach the vertical distance will be the same to reach the horizontal distance.
 
  • #15
It takes 7.8 s to hit the ground no matter how fast the plane is flying. It depends only on the altitude.

However, that need not be the time before the fly-over. The drop time should be computed from the requirement that the distance to the target at the drop time equal the horizontal velocity times 7.8.
 
  • #16
Nubcake, draw it out and u'll find it clearer :)
 
  • #17
I tried drawing it out but didn't make much sense , so let me get this straight , the correct answer is that they should release it 7.8 seconds before they fly over the target since it has a horizontal velocity of 220m s-1? Then it will land on the target otherwise if they dropped it whilst over the targe it wouldn't land on it but away from it?
 
  • #18
ya you can say that :). just that from this case we deduce the time taken first, then deduce the appropriate horizontal distance
 
  • #19
Alright then I'll accept your answer for now until I check with my teacher:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
19
Views
3K