Tspirit
- 50
- 6
I can't understand the solution to Problem 1.4(a). The solution is the following:
What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
The discussion revolves around a problem from Griffiths' textbook on quantum mechanics, specifically Problem 1.4(a), which involves understanding the relationship between probability distributions in polar and Cartesian coordinates. Participants are trying to clarify why the expressions for probability density in these two coordinate systems are considered equal.
The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and interpretations of the problem. Some have offered explanations regarding the mapping between the two coordinate systems and the necessity for the probabilities to align. However, there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of Griffiths' notation or the underlying assumptions.
Participants note potential ambiguities in Griffiths' definitions and the use of the same symbol for different quantities, which may contribute to the confusion. The discussion also highlights the importance of ensuring that the intervals in both coordinate systems correspond to the same physical quantities.
Tspirit said:[
What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
Yes, and it must be a one-to-one-mapping (more precisely a diffeomorphism).PeroK said:What he means is that if you take a small interval (a physical interval), then there is a definite probability that the needle lies in that interval, independent of coordinates.
If you express this probability in polar coordinates you get ##\rho (\theta) d\theta## and if you express this probability in cartesian coordinates you get ##\rho (x) dx## and, therefore, they must be equal.
What you must be careful of is that when you set up your problem, ##d \theta## and ##dx## do indeed cover the same physical interval.
It helps me to think of it this way (similar to PeroK's reply). The only way for the shadow to be between x and x + dx is for the pointer to be between the corresponding θ and θ + dθ as shown below (and vice versa). So, the probability that the shadow is between x and x + dx equals the probability that the pointer is between the corresponding values θ and θ + dθ. The values of dθ and dx that correspond to each other are given by dx = -r sinθ dθTspirit said:What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
Tspirit said:View attachment 106575
I can't understand the solution to Problem 1.4(a). The solution is the following:
View attachment 106576
What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
This explanation really helps me understanding the physical meaning of that, thank a lot!TSny said:It helps me to think of it this way (similar to PeroK's reply). The only way for the shadow to be between x and x + dx is for the pointer to be between the corresponding θ and θ + dθ as shown below (and vice versa). So, the probability that the shadow is between x and x + dx equals the probability that the pointer is between the corresponding values θ and θ + dθ. The values of dθ and dx that correspond to each other are given by dx = -r sinθ dθ
View attachment 106579