A problem on calculus in Griffiths' book

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem from Griffiths' textbook on quantum mechanics, specifically Problem 1.4(a), which involves understanding the relationship between probability distributions in polar and Cartesian coordinates. Participants are trying to clarify why the expressions for probability density in these two coordinate systems are considered equal.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the equality of the probability densities ρ(θ)dθ and ρ(x)dx. Some suggest that this equality stems from the need for consistent probability representation across different coordinate systems. Others explore the implications of Griffiths' notation and the physical meaning behind the probability distributions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and interpretations of the problem. Some have offered explanations regarding the mapping between the two coordinate systems and the necessity for the probabilities to align. However, there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of Griffiths' notation or the underlying assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in Griffiths' definitions and the use of the same symbol for different quantities, which may contribute to the confusion. The discussion also highlights the importance of ensuring that the intervals in both coordinate systems correspond to the same physical quantities.

Tspirit
Messages
50
Reaction score
6
upload_2016-9-27_22-5-42.png

I can't understand the solution to Problem 1.4(a). The solution is the following:
upload_2016-9-27_22-10-18.png

What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously Griffiths in problem 1.4 has not given a precise definition. So the only way is to guess from the solution (I don't like his QM textbook so much, because of all these little imprecisions, although I've not read the book myself but extrapolate this from the questions here in the forum). He takes usual polar coordinates for the speedometer with the angle restricted to ##\theta \in [0,\pi]##. Then the ##x## coordinate of the needle hand is
$$x=r \cos \theta.$$
The probability distribution for the angle is uniform, i.e.,
$$P(\theta)=\frac{1}{\pi}.$$
Now he wants the probability for the projection ##x##, which is in the range ##x \in [-r,r]##. You have to remember that this is a probability distribution, i.e., you must have
$$|\mathrm{d} \theta| P(\theta) = |\mathrm{d} x| \tilde{P}(x).$$
Now you have
$$|\mathrm{d} x|=r \sin \theta=\sqrt{r^2-x^2}.$$
Thus we have
$$\tilde{P}(x) = \left |\frac{\mathrm{d} \theta}{\mathrm{d} x} \right| P(\theta)=\frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{r^2-x^2}}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tspirit
vanhees71 said:
You have to remember that this is a probability distribution, i.e., you must have
|dθ|P(θ)=|dx|~P(x).​
Why should a probability distribution satisfy |dθ|P(θ)=|dx|~P(x) ? That's really my question. Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-9-27_22-42-24.png
    upload_2016-9-27_22-42-24.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 535
Tspirit said:
[

What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?

What he means is that if you take a small interval (a physical interval), then there is a definite probability that the needle lies in that interval, independent of coordinates.

If you express this probability in polar coordinates you get ##\rho (\theta) d\theta## and if you express this probability in cartesian coordinates you get ##\rho (x) dx## and, therefore, they must be equal.

What you must be careful of is that when you set up your problem, ##d \theta## and ##dx## do indeed cover the same physical interval.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tspirit
PeroK said:
What he means is that if you take a small interval (a physical interval), then there is a definite probability that the needle lies in that interval, independent of coordinates.

If you express this probability in polar coordinates you get ##\rho (\theta) d\theta## and if you express this probability in cartesian coordinates you get ##\rho (x) dx## and, therefore, they must be equal.

What you must be careful of is that when you set up your problem, ##d \theta## and ##dx## do indeed cover the same physical interval.
Yes, and it must be a one-to-one-mapping (more precisely a diffeomorphism).

PS: I'm sorry that I gave the complete answer, but when I answered, this was posted to the QT forum not the homework forum!
 
Tspirit said:
What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?
It helps me to think of it this way (similar to PeroK's reply). The only way for the shadow to be between x and x + dx is for the pointer to be between the corresponding θ and θ + dθ as shown below (and vice versa). So, the probability that the shadow is between x and x + dx equals the probability that the pointer is between the corresponding values θ and θ + dθ. The values of dθ and dx that correspond to each other are given by dx = -r sinθ dθ
upload_2016-9-27_11-17-25.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela, Tspirit, DrClaude and 1 other person
Tspirit said:
View attachment 106575
I can't understand the solution to Problem 1.4(a). The solution is the following:
View attachment 106576
What puzzles me is that ρ(θ)dθ=ρ(x)dx ? Why are they equal?

Part of the problem is Griffith's sloppy use of the same symbol ##\rho## to stand for two different things in the same problem.

To understand what is happening, start by avoiding such symbols at the start. The basic principle is that if a single event has a single probability value. If you represent the same event in two different ways (using two different variables) then the "manner" of expressing the probability in the two variables must lead to the same numerical answer. We have ##x = r \cos(\theta)## and ##x + \Delta x = r \cos(\theta + \Delta \theta) ##, where ##r > 0## is constant. To first order in small increments, we have ##\cos(\theta + \Delta \theta) = \cos(\theta) - \sin(\theta) \Delta \theta##, so the events ##(x \to x + \Delta x)## in ##x##-space and ##( r \cos(\theta) \to r \cos(\theta) - r\sin(\theta) \Delta \theta )## in ##\theta##-space are the same event, represented in two different ways. But, being the same event they have the same probability, so the probability that the ##x##-projection lies between ##x## and ##x + \Delta x## is the probability that the angle lies between ##\theta## and ##\theta + \Delta \theta##. Note that if ##\Delta x > 0## we have ##\Delta \theta < 0##, so the length of the small ##\theta##-interval is ##|\Delta \theta|##, not ##\Delta \theta##. This means that the probability we seek is ##\frac{1}{\pi}|\Delta \theta|##. We have
$$ \Delta x = - r \sin(\theta) \Delta \theta = - y \Delta \theta = -\sqrt{r^2-x^2} \Delta \theta, $$
so that
$$|\Delta \theta| = \frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2-x^2}} \Delta x. $$

Thus, the probability that the x-projection lies between ##x## and ##x + \Delta x## is
$$P ( x \to x + \Delta x) = \frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{r^2-x^2}} \Delta x$$.
That means that the so-called probability density of ##x## is
$$f(x) = \frac{1}{\pi \sqrt{r^2-x^2}} $$

In a nutshell, ##f(x) |dx|## and ## \rho(\theta) |d \theta|## are equal because they are just two different representations of the same probability.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman and Tspirit
TSny said:
It helps me to think of it this way (similar to PeroK's reply). The only way for the shadow to be between x and x + dx is for the pointer to be between the corresponding θ and θ + dθ as shown below (and vice versa). So, the probability that the shadow is between x and x + dx equals the probability that the pointer is between the corresponding values θ and θ + dθ. The values of dθ and dx that correspond to each other are given by dx = -r sinθ dθ
View attachment 106579
This explanation really helps me understanding the physical meaning of that, thank a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K