A Problem with Lippmann-Schwinger Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hyperreality
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on Problem 3.1 from "Quantum Theory of Fields" by Steven Weinberg, specifically regarding the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation. Participants report solving the problem to the second order in the coupling constant g, noting that their S-matrix exhibits zero contribution at first order. This outcome raises questions about the expected behavior of the S-matrix in such scenarios, with users seeking confirmation and insights on the absence of first-order contributions and the existence of non-approximate exact solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation
  • Familiarity with S-matrix formalism in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of perturbation theory, particularly in the context of coupling constants
  • Basic grasp of quantum mechanics and complex quantities
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of zero contributions in S-matrix calculations at first order in perturbation theory
  • Explore non-perturbative methods for solving the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation
  • Study examples of separable interactions in quantum field theory
  • Investigate advanced topics in quantum field theory, such as renormalization and scattering theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students studying quantum field theory, and researchers interested in perturbative methods and S-matrix calculations.

Hyperreality
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
I am doing Problem 3.1 from Quantum Theory of Fields by Steven Weinberg regaring the Lippmann-Schwinger Equation. The problem states,

Given a separable interaction,

\langle \alpha_{0}|V|\beta_{0}\rangle=g u_{\alpha}u_{\beta}^{*}

where g is a real coupling constant, and u_{\alpha} is a set of complex quantities with

\sum_{\alpha}|u_{\alpha}|^{2}=1

Use the Lippmann-Schwinger equation to find explicit solutions for the 'in' and 'out' state and the S-matrix.

I believe I have solved this to the second order in g, but I'm not sure if it is correct since there are no solutions. What I found puzzling is that my S-matrix has 0 contribution for the first order g. Is this suppose to happen? I do not want to show the working since it is too much mathematics. I am just wondering if there are anyone who has done similar problems.

Any comment is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hyperreality said:
I believe I have solved this to the second order in g, but I'm not sure if it is correct since there are no solutions. What I found puzzling is that my S-matrix has 0 contribution for the first order g. Is this suppose to happen? I do not want to show the working since it is too much mathematics. I am just wondering if there are anyone who has done similar problems.

Any comment is appreciated!
I am facing a similar problem too. I solved it up to 2nd order, and there was no contribution to the S-matrix at O(g) Also, I was wondering if there are non-approximate exact solutions. Did you find anything else?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K