A Projectile Fired At A 45 Degree Angle

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
38 replies · 8K views
miniradman
Messages
191
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile is fired at a 45 degree angle and its just barely able to make it above a 6m high fence that is 100 meters away. What was the projectile's initial velocity?


Homework Equations


x and y components?


The Attempt at a Solution


Well the problem with this one is that I don't know where to start. I mean this is basically the reverse of everything I've learned about projectile motion. I think I should be calculating the x and y components first but I'm not even sure how to do that.
 
on Phys.org
miniradman said:

Homework Statement


A projectile is fired at a 45 degree angle and its just barely able to make it above a 6m high fence that is 100 meters away. What was the projectile's initial velocity?


Homework Equations


x and y components?


The Attempt at a Solution


Well the problem with this one is that I don't know where to start. I mean this is basically the reverse of everything I've learned about projectile motion. I think I should be calculating the x and y components first but I'm not even sure how to do that.
In all these constant acceleration kinematics problems, the best place to start is by writing two lists. The first is a list of everything that you know already. The second, is a list of the things you want to know. You should do this for each component (vertical and horizontal) of the motion.
 
1. v=u+at (cannot use because there is no time or final velocity)
2. s= (u+v)/2 x t (cannot use because no time, distance or inital and final velocity)
3. s= ut + 1/2 at^2 (cannot use because there is no initial or final velocities or time or distance)
4. v^2 = u^2 +2as (cannot use this one because we have no inital or terminal velocity or distance)

Others
s=d/t (I'll most likely (definitely) use this at the end when I have my horizontal and veritcle components)

I'm sorry, but I honestly don't see how I can just have 1 variable when using any of these kinematics (when solving for the horizontal and veritcle components). Could using simultaneous equations be answer?

What I already know:
Distance from fence to launch point = 100m
Gravitational Acceleration = -9.8m/s or 9.8m/s
Angle of launch = 45 degrees
the x and y components would be equal? :confused:

What I need to know:
x and y components
total distace covered while in the air
time of flight?
inital velocity
 
Last edited:
NascentOxygen said:
It's fired with a velocity V at 45 degrees. Write the horizontal firing speed, in terms of V. Write the vertical firing speed, in terms of V.
Sorry mate, but I'm not exactly sure what is meant by "in terms of" :confused:
 
So the vertical component would be

Sinθ = o/V
Sin(45 = o/V


The horizontal component

Cosθ = a/V
Cos(45 = a/V

where hypotenues is equal to V

what now? this is where I get stuck because I don't know if I have enough infomation to move on or am I missing something:confused:
 
sorry, I was using trig functions where o = opposite and a = adjacent.

I might just keep it as: a = adj and o = opp

Can I use Cosθ = adj/hyp or speed=distance/time to figure out the horizontal component?
 
if the initial speed is v0, the horizontal component is u0=v0*cosθ and the vertical w0=v0*sinθ.

Do you see this? :)
 
Last edited:
I think so, but I don't see how you can get numbers out of those letters :biggrin: :confused:
 
one step at a time ;)
you may be used to other notations like v_x instead of u or whatever, but get comfortable with what components mean first.
 
this excerise is a bit tricky, cause as you say, it's "the other way around". but we know, considering the equations for the two components, that;

6m= - gt^2+V0*sinθ*t (the relevant velocity is here the vertical hence the sine)

100m= V0*cosθ*t (the horizontal velocity calls for the use of a cosine)everybody concur? :)
Since we have 2 equations and 2 unknowns, finding the answer for V0, the initial velocity, is just some algebraic puzzlework.
 
Last edited:
You're absolutely right, I forgot to insert for theta. It's best to keep the symbols as long as possible though, to obtain a more general solution :)
 
Cipherflak said:
this excerise is a bit tricky, cause as you say, it's "the other way around". but we know, considering the equations for the two components, that;

6m= - gt^2+V0*sinθ*t (the relevant velocity is here the vertical hence the sine)

100m= V0*cosθ*t (the horizontal velocity calls for the use of a cosine)


everybody concur? :)
Since we have 2 equations and 2 unknowns, finding the answer for V0, the initial velocity, is just some algebraic puzzlework.
So simultaneous equations?
 
Cipherflak said:
this excerise is a bit tricky, cause as you say, it's "the other way around". but we know, considering the equations for the two components, that;

6m= - gt^2+V0*sinθ*t (the relevant velocity is here the vertical hence the sine)

100m= V0*cosθ*t (the horizontal velocity calls for the use of a cosine)


everybody concur? :)
Since we have 2 equations and 2 unknowns, finding the answer for V0, the initial velocity, is just some algebraic puzzlework.
I'm not sure if this is correct, but what if I say that the launch point was 6 metres above ground and I removed the fence. Would the time of flight be that same if the launch was on the ground and the fence was 100m away?
 
if the velocity of the y component is zero at 100 meters away and Vy=V0 - gt, then what does that tell you about the time it takes to get there?
 
Not yet, but I have drawn a sketch of this two to show my line of thought.

As for finishing the problem at hand... I didn't really understand how it works (it seems like maths is a world apart). I don't know what V0 or Vy means?
 

Attachments

  • wcdvfvb.jpg
    wcdvfvb.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 536
I'll summarize how these motion at the Earth's surface problems are solved.

Horizontally, with no air resistance, projectiles travel at a constant speed. This means that its shadow travels over the land at a constant speed. What speed would this be? It's the same horizontal component of speed with which it was launched. Even when the projectile soars way up into the sky, before returning, following a high arc, its shadow all the time sweeps across the landscape at a steady speed.

Vertically, the motion is affected by gravity, and the vertical component of velocity follows the equations you know that involve acceleration "a" which is gravity. Gravity slows down the vertical ascent speed until the projectile eventually ceases vertical motion for a moment (i.e., is neither going up nor down), then it speeds up again but now in a downwards direction.
 
Last edited:
miniradman said:
I'm not sure if this is correct, but what if I say that the launch point was 6 metres above ground and I removed the fence. Would the time of flight be that same if the launch was on the ground and the fence was 100m away?

No, my equations are correct.

If you stand on your fence and hit the ground 100 away instead, the bullet would need a different intitial velocity and time of flight. (swap 6m with -6m and work from there).
 
Last edited:
NascentOxygen said:
If you launch an identical projectile from 6 metres above the ground, with the same firing angle (45 deg), at 100m it will now clear a fence 12 metres high.
Touch'e :approve:

Ok, I'm lost... No matter what I do to the simultaneous equations. I never get the right answer :cry:

This is what I did

6=-9.81t^2 + y*(sin45 = 0.7071)----------------1
100=y*(cos45 = 0.7071)*t ----------------------2

make y the subject for eqn 2.

y=100/0.7071t

Sub y value into eqn 1

-6=-9.8t^2*(100/0.7071t)*0.7071

"0.7071" a "t" from -9.8t^t cancel out because of "0.7071" under the "100"

-6=-9.8t+100
100+6=9.8t
106/9.8 = 9.8t/9.8
9.24=t

I know I MUST have made a mistake but the worst part is that I can't see it :cry:
 
Rayquesto said:
if the velocity of the y component is zero at 100 meters away and Vy=V0 - gt, then what does that tell you about the time it takes to get there?
hypothetically... if the y component was 0 at 100m, it will be at its peak height or on the ground. If it was at its peak height, this means that the time it takes to get there is affected by gravity. The only problem is that 100m mark isn't at peak height or on the ground.
 
yup, you switched a + for a *. also, it seems you added a minus to the 6. Drop the minus.

(I hope it wasn't because you misread my last post, the -6m thing was just an answer to your hypotethical situation where you stand 6m above ground and just clear a "fence 0 meters high".)
 
I'll try it that way.

6=9.81t^2 + y*(sin45 = 0.7071)----------------1
100=y*(cos45 = 0.7071)*t ----------------------2

make y the subject for eqn 2.

y=100/0.7071t

Sub y value into eqn 1

6=9.8t^2*(100/0.7071t)*0.7071

"0.7071" a "t" from -9.8t^t cancel out because of "0.7071" under the "100"

6=9.8t+100
100-6=9.8t
94/9.8 = 9.8t/9.8

9.59=t

My answer should be around 4-5ish seconds