B A quartet of epi-illumination methods

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy Resnick
  • Start date Start date
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
7,663
Reaction score
3,709
TL;DR Summary
I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss)
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So, not only are epi-Ph lenses impossible to find, but they are cheap because nobody wants them :)

Here are 4 images of a razorblade comparing the different epi illumination methods, all using 40x lenses. In order: brightfield, phase contrast, DIC, and darkfield:

DSC_7951 copy.webp



DSC_7952 copy.webp


DSC_7953 copy.webp


DSC_7954 copy.webp


While epi-phase looks a bit like epi-darkfield, the biggest difference is the light throughput- 1/30 s shutter (phase) instead of 5 s (darkfield).

Success! I feel like Captain Ahab, if he had finally caught Moby Dick. But I guess that would moot the point of the story....
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and berkeman
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top