B A quartet of epi-illumination methods

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andy Resnick
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the acquisition of a rare set of Zeiss epi-phase microscope objectives after nearly 20 years of searching. Epi-phase contrast microscopy, while similar to transillumination phase contrast, uses a different phase ring and has seen declining popularity since the advent of epi-DIC. The user shares images comparing various epi-illumination methods, highlighting the differences in light throughput and image quality. The objectives were purchased inexpensively, indicating a lack of demand for this specific type. The user expresses excitement about mastering the technique and showcases the unique capabilities of epi-phase contrast in revealing surface topography.
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
7,670
Reaction score
3,719
TL;DR Summary
I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss)
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So, not only are epi-Ph lenses impossible to find, but they are cheap because nobody wants them :)

Here are 4 images of a razorblade comparing the different epi illumination methods, all using 40x lenses. In order: brightfield, phase contrast, DIC, and darkfield:

DSC_7951 copy.webp



DSC_7952 copy.webp


DSC_7953 copy.webp


DSC_7954 copy.webp


While epi-phase looks a bit like epi-darkfield, the biggest difference is the light throughput- 1/30 s shutter (phase) instead of 5 s (darkfield).

Success! I feel like Captain Ahab, if he had finally caught Moby Dick. But I guess that would moot the point of the story....
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur, Ibix and berkeman
Science news on Phys.org
Andy Resnick said:
TL;DR Summary: I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss)

but they are cheap because nobody wants them :)
II that 'cheap' like a second hand Maserati or cheap cheap? Captain Ahab went overboard , remember so be careful.

I guess they need all you existing gear to do their stuff. I'm pleased for you and the images are interesting. Could you do labels?
:thumbup:
 
sophiecentaur said:
II that 'cheap' like a second hand Maserati or cheap cheap? Captain Ahab went overboard , remember so be careful.

I guess they need all you existing gear to do their stuff. I'm pleased for you and the images are interesting. Could you do labels?
:thumbup:
cheap-cheap: Including shipping from Europe, the cost was $US 120 for all three, all in new condition, likely never used :)

Thanks, re: the images. More to come as I improve my technique!
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
I'm starting to get the hang of it; in microscopy (unlike astronomy), the photographer must prepare their own objects to photograph. Epi-phase works best on extremely flat surfaces (polished metal, for example... or computer chips), and here's what I was able to produce: all images are JPG straight off the camera, no post-processing/photoshop/etc. The first image is epi-brightfield, the second epi-phase.

First, an overprocessed CCD array:

DSC_8567.webp


DSC_8568.webp


Epi-Phase contrast works by using 2 filters to cause specularly reflected light to destructively interfere with itself, so that the image intensity is proportional to the phase difference between "scattered" and "unscattered" reflected light. (I don't know better terminology). The colors here are most likely from thin-film interference created by multiple transparent layers.

And next, another IC but completely "blank" (obviously there's something going on underneath the opaque layer):

DSC_9063.webp


DSC_9065.webp


Here, epi-phase clearly shows the topography of the top layer. This image also shows how unforgiving the technique is for (ahem) dirty optics (see the dark rings along the right side) and misaligned components anywhere in the entire optical path (uneven illumination).

Also- if anyone can identify that cryptic logo (not the year or copyright symbol, duh....) on the second set of images, I'd appreciate it!
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top