A question about Fermat's method of calculating areas under curves

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter murshid_islam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Areas Curves Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Fermat's method for calculating areas under curves of the form y = x^n, specifically focusing on the derivation of the area formula using geometric series. Participants explore the correct approach to summing the areas of rectangles formed under the curve and clarify misunderstandings regarding the dimensions of these rectangles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes Fermat's method involving dividing the interval into subintervals and using a geometric progression to find the area under the curve.
  • Another participant suggests that the heights of the rectangles should be based on the averages of adjacent ordinates rather than the ordinates themselves.
  • A participant acknowledges a mistake in calculating the areas of the rectangles and provides a corrected formula for the area.
  • There is confusion regarding the lengths of the bases of the rectangles, with participants questioning whether the base length should be a or (a - ar).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct method for calculating the areas of rectangles under the curve, and there is no consensus on the approach to take. Some participants correct earlier claims while others maintain their original positions.

Contextual Notes

Participants' calculations depend on specific assumptions about the dimensions of the rectangles and the method of summation used, which remain unresolved.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
I am currently reading the book "e: The Story of a Number" by Eli Maor. And I got stuck at something. In chapter 7 of the book, the author described the method Fermat used to calculate areas under curves of the form [itex]y = x^n[/itex], where n is a positive integer. I am quoting the relevant bit here (sorry, I can't show the figure, but from the description, you can easily receate it):

Figure 19 shows a portion of the curve [itex]y = x^n[/itex] between the points [itex]x = 0[/itex] and [itex]x = a[/itex] on the x-axis. We imagine that the interval from [itex]x = 0[/itex] to [itex]x = a[/itex] is divided into an infinite number of subintervals by the points ... K, L, M, N, where ON = a. Then, starting at N and working backward, if these intervals are to form a decreasing geometric progression, we have ON = a, OM = ar, OL = ar2, and so on, where r is less than 1. The heights (ordinates) to the curve at these points are then [itex]a^n[/itex], [itex](ar)^n[/itex], [itex](ar^{2})^n[/itex], ... From this it is easy to find the area of each rectangle and then sum up the areas, using the summation formula for an infinite geometric series. The result is the formula,

[tex]A_{r} = \frac{a^{n+1}(1-r)}{1 - r^{n+1}}[/tex]

where the subscript r under the A indicates that this area still depends on our choice of r.
Now I can't get to the final formula. The areas of each rectangle I found are [itex]a^{n+1}, (ar)^{n+1}, (ar^{2})^{n+1},[/itex] and so on. Their sum,

[tex]A_{r} = a^{n+1} + (ar)^{n+1} + (ar^{2})^{n+1} + \cdots[/tex]
[tex]= a^{n+1}\left(1 + r^{n+1} + r^{2(n+1)} + \cdots \right)[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{a^{n+1}}{1 - r^{n+1}}[/tex]Where am I getting wrong?
.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the ordinates to get the heights of the rectangles. I think the formula is based on using the averages of the adjacent ordinates to get the rectangle heights,
 
mathman said:
You are using the ordinates to get the heights of the rectangles. I think the formula is based on using the averages of the adjacent ordinates to get the rectangle heights,

Thanks, but that was not it. I've just figured out my mistake. I got the areas of the rectangles wrong. The sum of the areas would be,

[tex]A_r = (a - ar)a^n + (ar - ar^2)(ar)^n + (ar^2 - ar^3)(ar^2)^n + \cdots[/tex]
[tex]A_r = a^{n+1}(1 - r) \left(1 + r^{n+1} + r^{2(n+1)} + \cdots \right)[/tex]
[tex]A_r = \frac{a^{n+1}(1 - r)}{1 - r^{n+1}}[/tex]
 
murshid_islam said:
The areas of each rectangle I found are [itex]a^{n+1}, (ar)^{n+1}, (ar^{2})^{n+1},[/itex]
.

I don't understand how you got those areas. Does the base of the first rectangle have length = a or does it have length = (a - ar)?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
I don't understand how you got those areas. Does the base of the first rectangle have length = a or does it have length = (a - ar)?

Yes, that's the mistake I made. I posted the correct calculation in this post: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3604692&postcount=3"

The bases are (a - ar), (ar - ar2), (ar2 - ar3), and so on.
.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K