A question about Joule's experiment

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Misr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

James Joule's experiment utilized eight movable paddles and four fixed vanes to prevent water circulation, ensuring that the energy input was converted entirely into heat rather than motion. The experiment demonstrated that to raise the temperature of water, it is essential to induce random motion among water molecules, rather than uniform motion. Joule's findings established the mechanical equivalent of heat at 4.16 Joules/calorie, which closely aligns with today's accepted value of 4.184 Joules/calorie. The experiment consisted of multiple trials, including variations with different energy input methods, leading to consistent results across different setups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Joule's experiments and their historical context
  • Knowledge of calorimetry techniques
  • Basic grasp of energy transfer concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical significance of Joule's experiments in thermodynamics
  • Study the principles of calorimetry and its applications
  • Explore the concept of mechanical work and energy conversion
  • Learn about the differences between uniform and random motion in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching thermodynamics, researchers in energy conversion, and anyone interested in the foundational experiments of heat and energy transfer.

Misr
Messages
384
Reaction score
0
In the famous experiment of James Joule,
he used eight movable paddles and four fixed ones to prevent water circulation
so why did he want to prevent water circulation?
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
I'm unaware of that level of detail regarding his apparatus, but if true, a likely reason is that he did not want the water to have any energy available to do work, which would be the case if the water within the tank was rotating uniformly. There would, for example, be a transfer of energy from the rotating water back onto the (moving) paddles.
 
I'm unaware of that level of detail regarding his apparatus, but if true, a likely reason is that he did not want the water to have any energy available to do work, which would be the case if the water within the tank was rotating uniformly. There would, for example, be a transfer of energy from the rotating water back onto the (moving) paddles.
I don't really understand this .
but i think if the water rotated uniformly - without using the fixed vanes- the molecules of water wouldn't rub together , consequently no rise in temperature would occur

i don't know whether this is true or not but do u have better explanation?
 
Let me back up- what was the result of Joule's experiment, and how is this conclusion supported by the data?
 
Joules experiments to determine the mechanical equivalent of heat were actually a series of experiments, the paddle wheel being just one.

Essentially a known amount of energy was put into a known quantity of water and the resultant temperature rise measured.

Since the input agitated the water paddles were used to still the water so all the energy input ended up as heat, not motion.

In one case paddles were also used to agitate the water. These were driven by a falling weight, so defining the mechanical work.

There were four experiments in all with the following resulting numbers of foot-pounds of work required to raise 1 pound of water one degree Farenheit.

Paddles (fluid turbulence) 773
Compressed Gas (PV work) 795
Rubbing two iron blocks (Friction) 775
Electric current (resistive heating) 838

This lead to his conculsion that the mechanical equivalent of heat was 4.16 Joules/calorie. (CF today's value 4.184)
 
I never did the Joule paddle experiment but I do remember doing the Callender and Barnes experiment with water flowing over an electrical element. I was 'well chuffed' (as you can be at 17) by the idea of making sure the hot outlet temperature and cold inlet temperature were kept symmetrical about room temperature to eliminate / reduce the effects of spurious heat loss.
I can't remember what answer we got but I can guarantee that we would have calculated it to an inappropriately large number of sig figs.
 
but this is not the answer to my question
 
Without the paddles most of the energy would go into moving the water rather then heating the water. To heat the water you need to induce lots of collisions between water molecules so each molecule needs to have a motion which is not the same as its neighbors. If they all have the same velocity as in nice uniformly stirred water which moves with the exact same velocity of the moving paddles then you will not see much change in temperature. The idea is to put the paddles energy into RANDOM motion of the water, not uniform motion. The stationary paddles do not allow the water to move uniformly around the container.
 
Actually, Misr I bothered to look up the original experiment and read it properly.

I believed you had done so when you reported there were two sets of paddles, but there was only one set.

You may have been confusing vanes which were fixed to the inside of the casing to assist mixing and friction. There was a narrow gap between the fixed vanes and the moveable paddles. They were more like tubine blades or a kitchen blender than paddle steamer wheels.

The paddle consists of eight sets of four arms spaced equally round the axle and rotating in between four sets of vanes, each having five arms, fixed to the wall of the calorimeter
 
Last edited:
  • #10
"but this is not the answer to my question "

The answer/s is /are clear, I think. If the water is still moving then that proportion of the input Energy is not yet transferred to Heat - it's still coherent KE.
The longer the experiment takes, the more heat will 'get out' into the surroundings and add inaccuracy, so get the transfer to happen as fast as poss. Also, I suppose that you need good mixing so that the measured temperature really does represent the temperature of all the water.
 
  • #11
Without the paddles most of the energy would go into moving the water rather then heating the water. To heat the water you need to induce lots of collisions between water molecules so each molecule needs to have a motion which is not the same as its neighbors. If they all have the same velocity as in nice uniformly stirred water which moves with the exact same velocity of the moving paddles then you will not see much change in temperature. The idea is to put the paddles energy into RANDOM motion of the water, not uniform motion. The stationary paddles do not allow the water to move uniformly around the container.
That's it!
Thanks for all of you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
793
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K