A question about kinematics of a rigid rotor

  • Thread starter Thread starter dorratz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Rotor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around kinematic concepts related to the motion of a rigid rotor, specifically addressing the angular velocities of multiple bodies and the relative velocities between points on a rotating system. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in a homework context.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to understand the summation of angular velocities for the disk, suggesting that the disk should have a total angular velocity rather than just the angular velocity of one body.
  • Another participant provides an analogy involving the Earth's rotation to explain the summation of angular velocities, indicating that multiple angular velocities can contribute to a total angular velocity.
  • There is a query regarding the reference of velocity Vc and the addition of relative velocity from points E to D instead of C to D, with a participant noting that points E and C are on the same axis.
  • A participant challenges this by stating that while E and C are on the same axis, they are not at the same coordinates, suggesting that the distance vector and angular velocity product would differ.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the relevant factor is the distance from the axis of rotation, arguing that all points at the same distance from the axis rotate at the same velocity regardless of their position along the shaft.
  • A request for a mathematical explanation is made, indicating that formal mathematics should yield different results.
  • A mathematical expression is presented, but its relevance and correctness are not clarified within the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between angular velocities and the reference points for relative velocity, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of angular velocity and relative velocity, as well as the mathematical relationships involved in the discussion.

dorratz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hey guys,

I have a question about this(I know you want to see my soultion, but I've done it ok except the 2 things I'm asking about) :
http://athena.ecs.csus.edu/~grandajj/me143/1_Introduction_Tires_WM2D/1_4_2_Exercise_2.pdf

2 questions:
1. How can I undersdant that I should sum up the angular velocity(w) of both bodies into one w, so that the the disk itself has the total w? why the disk doesn't have just w2?
2. Why the solution for contains reference of Vc, but the addition of relative velocity is from E to D, and not from C to D?

Thanks,
Dor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's been a long time since I did this but...

dorratz said:
1. How can I undersdant that I should sum up the angular velocity(w) of both bodies into one w, so that the the disk itself has the total w? why the disk doesn't have just w2?

It's because you have one rotating disc mounted on another rotating disc. Suppose you stand at the north pole and turn around slowly with respect to planet earth. Then your angular velocity relative to the sun is equal to..

w1 + w2 + w3
where
w1 is your angular velocity relative to the earth.
w2 is the angular velocity of the Earth relative to the sun (approximately 360 degrees per day)
w3 is the angular velocity of the Earth as it orbits the sun (approximately 360 degrees per year)

dorratz said:
2. Why the solution for contains reference of Vc...

The velocity of D with respect to B = (Velocity of C with respect to B) + (Velocity of D with respect to C)

where "+" means vector addition

.. but the addition of relative velocity is from E to D, and not from C to D?

Points E and C are on the same axis. So the velocity of E relative to B is the same as the velocity of C relative to B.
 
Hi,
The first answer is understoood.
As for the second question, I don't undersdand, because although the two points are on same axis, they aren't on the same cooardinate, so the distance vector between them and point B is different, so the vector product of angular velocity and distance vector will be different.
 
What matters is that they are the same distance from the axis of rotation (0.15m).

If you connect a motor to one end of a cylindrical shaft and rotate it at say 10rpm then all points on the surface of the shaft rotate at the same velocity regardless of how far along the shaft they are. The radius of the shaft affects the velocity of a point not position along it's length.

There is probably better way to explain this mathematically but I'm afraid very rusty.
 
Thanks a lot

If there is anyone who knows how to explain it mathematically I would thank him, cause by the formal math it should be different.
 
$$ | DE \times CE | = | DE |\ |CE | \\ | DC \times CE | = | DC |\ |CE | \sin(\angle DCE) = | DC |\ |CE |\ { |DE|\over |DC| } = | DE |\ |CE | \quad \rm ?$$and of course both are in the z-direction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K