Two disks -- An educational problem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematic problem involving two disks connected by a rigid bridge. Participants explore the dynamics of the system, including the angular velocities and accelerations of the disks, as well as the implications of varying disk radii and configurations. The conversation includes theoretical considerations, mathematical formulations, and potential applications in educational contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the problem and asks for the angular velocity and acceleration of the right disk given the left disk's parameters.
  • Another participant questions whether the rigid bridge affects the motion similarly to a rigid rod.
  • Some participants discuss the scenario where the radii of the disks are equal, likening it to linked locomotive wheels.
  • Mathematical expressions are presented to describe the motion and constraints of the system, including angular velocities and accelerations.
  • Participants derive equations governing the motion of points B and D, including time derivatives and constraints on angles and angular velocities.
  • There is a discussion about the uniqueness of solutions when the radii are equal, with some asserting that there are multiple solutions depending on the direction of rotation.
  • One participant corrects a previous mathematical expression regarding the definitions of variables used in their calculations.
  • Another participant draws a connection to classic four-bar linkages in mechanical theory.
  • Concerns are raised about the intersection points of the disks' rotations and the implications for speed consistency in different rotation scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express both agreement and disagreement on various points, particularly regarding the uniqueness of solutions for equal radii and the implications of the rigid bridge. Multiple competing views remain on the effects of different configurations and the mathematical interpretations of the system's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical expressions depend on specific assumptions about the system's configuration and the definitions of variables. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of the constraints involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to educators, students, and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those focused on kinematics, mechanical systems, and educational problem-solving approaches.

wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,281
Reaction score
1,089
Let me share an educational problem which I learned from my friend Prof. M. Kirsanov. Perhaps somebody finds it interesting to discuss it with students. I do.
The problem is pure kinematic.

Assume we have two disks which can rotate about their fixed centers ##A,C,\quad |AC|=b##. The radii of the disks are ##R,r,\quad R>r## respectively. The discks are connected by a rigid bridge ##BFGD## and ##B,D## are the hinges placed on the rims of the disks. At one moment the system has the position that is shown at the picture ; the angular velocity and the angular acceleration of the left disk are given: ##\omega,\varepsilon##.
Find angular velocity and angular acceleration of the right disk at this moment.

Can the system move in the vicinity of shown position? What is configuration space of this system? What if ##r=R##?
 

Attachments

  • diski.png
    diski.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 298
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM, Lnewqban, Abhishek11235 and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Is connected by rigid bridge BFGD is same with connected by rigid rod BD in considering the motion ?
 
wrobel said:
What if ##r=R##?
Then it's like linked locomotive wheels going at the same rate.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak and BvU
Ooo okay, I try the first part, but I maybe screw it up. Since$$\left(\frac{d}{dt}\right)_{t=t_0} \mathbf{BD} = (\omega_2 r - \omega R) \mathbf{e}_y$$and$$\left( \frac{d^2}{dt^2}\right)_{t=t_0} \mathbf{BD} = (\varepsilon_2 r - \varepsilon R) \mathbf{e}_y - (\omega_2^2 r - \omega^2 R) \mathbf{e}_x$$Point D constrained to perform circular motion about point B, i.e. ##\frac{d}{dt}|\mathbf{BD}| = 0##, so we have$$ (\omega_2^2 r - \omega^2 R) = (b+r-R)\left( \frac{\omega_2 r - \omega R}{b+r-R} \right)^2$$or in other words that$$\omega_2^2 r(b-R) + 2 \omega r R \omega_2 - \omega^2 R(b+r) = 0$$so in that case

$$\begin{align*}

\omega_{2,\pm} = \frac{-2 \omega r R \pm \sqrt{4 \omega^2 r^2 R^2 + 4R r \omega^2 (b-R)(b+r)}}{2r(b-R)} &= \left[ \frac{-r R \pm \sqrt{Rrb \rho}}{r(b-R)} \right] \omega

\end{align*}$$where ##\rho = |BD| = b + r - R##.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have written formulas just for the case
ω≠0, ρ=b+r−R>0, ##R>r##
my result is
$$\omega_*=\omega p_\pm,\quad \varepsilon_*=\varepsilon p_\pm,\quad p_\pm=\frac{Rr\pm\sqrt{R\rho br}}{r(R-r)}$$
 
Let us take xy coordinate for moving points
B=(R\cos\theta,R\sin\theta)
D=(b+r \cos\phi, r \sin\phi)
BD^2 is constant
(b-R+r)^2=(R\cos\theta-b-r \cos\phi)^2+(R\sin\theta-r \sin\phi)^2
bR(1-\cos\theta)-br(1-\cos\phi)+Rr(1-\cos(\theta-\phi))=0...(1)
Taking time derivative
bR\sin\theta\dot{\theta}-br\sin\phi\dot{\phi}+Rr\sin(\theta-\phi)(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})=0...(2)
Taking time derivative again
bR\sin\theta\ddot{\theta}-br\sin\phi\ddot{\phi}+Rr\sin(\theta-\phi)(\ddot{\theta}-\ddot{\phi})<br /> +bR\cos\theta\dot{\theta}^2-br\cos\phi\dot{\phi}^2+Rr\cos(\theta-\phi)(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})^2=0...(3)
These three equations show constraints on angle, angular velocity and angular acceleration.

For ##\theta=\phi=0## , (3) becomes
bR\dot{\theta}^2-br\dot{\phi}^2+Rr(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})^2=0
quadratic equation of ##\dot{\phi}## with ##\dot{\theta}## given. The solution is
\dot{\phi}=\dot{\theta}[ \frac{\pm\sqrt{\frac{b\rho}{Rr}}-1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}]
where
\rho=b-R+r
As ##\frac{b\rho}{Rr}>1##, + solution: ortho, - solution: reverse rotation.

Ref. post #4 in the special case of ##R=r##,##\rho=b## and
+ solution
\dot{\phi}_+=\dot{\theta}
like locomotive wheels.
- solution
\dot{\phi}_-=-\dot{\theta}\frac{\frac{b}{R}+1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}EDIT as suggested by @wrobel in post #8, time derivative of (3) after making ##\theta=\phi=0## is
bR\dot{\theta}\ddot{\theta}-br\dot{\phi}\ddot{\phi}+Rr(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})(\ddot{\theta}-\ddot{\phi})=0
It would give the solution ##\ddot{\phi}_{\pm}## with ##\dot{\theta}, \ddot{\theta}, \dot{\phi}_{\pm}## provided,

\frac{\ddot{\phi}}{\ddot{\theta}}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}<br /> (-1+\frac{\frac{\frac{b}{r}\frac{b}{R}+\frac{b}{r}+\frac{b}{R}}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}{\frac{\dot{\phi}}{\dot{\theta}}-\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}).

Using the previous result,
\frac{\ddot{\phi}_\pm}{\ddot{\theta}}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}<br /> (-1+\frac{\frac{\frac{b}{r}\frac{b}{R}+\frac{b}{r}+\frac{b}{R}}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}{[ \frac{\pm\sqrt{\frac{b\rho}{Rr}}-1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}]-\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
anuttarasammyak said:
et us take xy coordinate for moving points
my argument was the same but
anuttarasammyak said:
These three equations
there are no three equations: for ##\theta=\phi=0## (2) vanishes and we have to calculate ##\frac{d^3}{dt^3}##

A.T. said:
Then it's like linked locomotive wheels going at the same rate.
for ##R>r## there are two solutions. I am not sure that for ##R=r## the solution is unique

the function ##f(\phi,\theta)=|BD|^2## has a saddle point at ##\phi=\theta=0##.
The equation ##f=\rho^2## gives two intersecting curves in the plane ##(\phi,\theta)##.
That is the point:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak and etotheipi
wrobel said:
I am not sure that for ##R=r## the solution is unique
It's not. The wheels can go in the same or opposite directions. But I think they will have the same speed in both cases.
 
  • #10
in my formulas the expression ##(R-r)## must be replaced with ##(R-b)##
Pardon
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #11
I realized that in my initial expression I let ##b = |BD|##, whilst it is actually defined ##b = |AC|##. So I corrected that now in my post #5, and get the same as wrobel 😀
 
  • #12
Using notation of my post #7 the range of angles are
##\theta[-\theta_0,+\theta_0]## for R ##\geq## r
which satisfy law of sines
\frac{\sin\theta_0}{\rho+r}=\frac{\sin(\pi-\phi_0)}{R}=\frac{\sin(\phi_0-\theta_0)}{b}
where
\rho=b-R+r

Figure attached. Thanks @wrobel.
 

Attachments

  • 2disks.jpg
    2disks.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 270
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #13
Isn't this simply the classic four bar linkage routinely studied in Theory of Machines?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Consider the wheels almost touching. If the RH wheel rotates anticlockwise though some angle, moving D to D', then a circle radius BD centred on D' will intersect the LH wheel rim in two places, but both will be above the line BD.
I see one intersection above and one below. But they have different distances to BD, so for opposite rotation the speeds are not the same all the time. For same rotation direction the speeds are the same.
 
  • #15
A.T. said:
I see one intersection above and one below. But they have different distances to BD, so for opposite rotation the speeds are not the same all the time. For same rotation direction the speeds are the same.
You are right, my mistake.
 
  • #16
troisbarres%20ext%201.gif
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: dRic2, Charles Link, pervect and 7 others
  • #17
Dazzling. But how about
wrobel said:
rigid bridge BFGD
 
  • #18
BvU said:
Dazzling. But how about

rigid bridge BFGD
The BFGD bridge is not shown in the aninmation by @Lnewqban, but it is rigid. All you need is BD to have constant length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #19
Oops, of course. Total goof ! o:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
749
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K