A question about the Stanford Lectures on Fourier Transforms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the relevance of learning Fourier Transforms for a friend pursuing a BSc in Physics, particularly through Stanford's online lectures. Fourier Transforms are deemed crucial for physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, with the teaching approach varying slightly between disciplines. While the content is fundamentally similar across fields, the application may differ. The consensus is that mastering foundational subjects, such as calculus, is essential before tackling advanced topics like Fourier Transforms. For students already comfortable with calculus and related subjects, exploring these lectures could be beneficial. However, prioritizing a solid understanding of the basics is emphasized, as Fourier Transforms frequently recur in various physics courses. The individual expressing interest in these lectures has a solid background in calculus and is currently focused on learning Linear Algebra, indicating a readiness to explore additional mathematical concepts.
WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
I told one of my friends about the Stanford OCW and he found the "Lectures on Fourier Transforms for Electrical Engineers".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZNm7L96pfY&feature=PlayList&p=B24BC7956EE040CD&index=0

Since it is summer time, he said he might spend time looking through that stuff. The question is if it will be useful for him or not as he wants to be a physicist and is currently doing a BSc in Physics. So what do you think? Will learning about the Fourier Transform how Electrical Engineers learn it help somewhere along the line? Is it any different from how physicists would learn about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. Actually I might also be interested in viewing these. I haven't chosen a major yet but I am either going to pick mathematics or physics. I would be inclined towards watching these lectures if it would be help me in either of these fields in college.
 
Fourier transforms are definitely extremely important for physicists, as well as engineers and mathematicians. The electrical engineers might teach it a little bit differently but basically it's going to be the same as you would see it in a math course or in a physics course.

Whether or not it is the MOST important thing to study over the summer, or the best way to spend your time, is a whole another ball game. It just depends on what else you know and what courses you have coming up. Fourier transforms and Fourier series are relatively advanced, so at the high school level, it probably makes more sense to focus on mastering some of the more basic subjects first (such as calculus). But it definitely wouldn't hurt to look at it.
 
mordechai9 said:
Fourier transforms are definitely extremely important for physicists, as well as engineers and mathematicians. The electrical engineers might teach it a little bit differently but basically it's going to be the same as you would see it in a math course or in a physics course.

Whether or not it is the MOST important thing to study over the summer, or the best way to spend your time, is a whole another ball game. It just depends on what else you know and what courses you have coming up. Fourier transforms and Fourier series are relatively advanced, so at the high school level, it probably makes more sense to focus on mastering some of the more basic subjects first (such as calculus). But it definitely wouldn't hurt to look at it.

I agree with the sentiments here, and particularly ecco what mordechai9 has said in the second part of the post. Fourier transforms are massively important, but I'd only consider confronting it if you're already hugely comfortable with everything you've been introduced to in school thusfar. There's no point in pressing ahead to things that are 'important' if you haven't mastered the basics.

That said, when you do get introduced to Fourier transforms more formally in school, make sure you understand what's going on! I guess this can be said about anything that you're taught, but Fourier transform talk resonates with me in particular because I dealt with them in math for a while, and in various physics courses before I realized that I could use them and I got the 'idea + reasoning' but for whatever reason I just wasn't fully comfortable with it. As you progress through a physics degree, there will be certain things that just keep coming up all over the place, in courses of all different kinds - Fourier transforms is one of these things. Them and wave equations.. it's actually rather remarkable and is one of the reasons I love physics.
 
Okay, thanks guys. I am already proficient with calculus to a certain level. I learned from a book called Tom M. Apostol [ Single Variable Calculus - Volume 1 ]. I also learned quite a bit of multivariable calculus and differential equations from MIT OCW 18.02 and 18.03 and Mary L. Boas [ Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences ]. I am currently learning Linear Algebra from a book called Kenneth Hoffman and Ray Kunze [ Linear Algebra - edition 2], a copy of which I got hold of. Learning Linear Algebra is my priority this summer. However, this looked interesting and I thought I'd look into it. I just wanted to know if anything was different in an engineer's perspective and if these lectures would be useful in that sense. Anyway, thank you again for your comments. Nonetheless, further information will be appreciated.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Back
Top