A question of Einstein field equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the energy-momentum tensor from a given metric in the context of general relativity, specifically using the Einstein field equations. Participants explore the implications of obtaining a non-zero Ricci scalar while finding a zero energy-momentum tensor.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion over deriving the energy-momentum tensor from the metric ds² = t⁻²(dx² - dt²), noting that they obtained a Ricci scalar R = 2 but found Tαβ = 0 for all α, β.
  • Another participant points out that a Schwarzschild black hole represents a curved spacetime with no stress-energy tensor, suggesting that the initial participant's result is indeed possible.
  • A third participant corrects the notation of the Einstein field equations as Rαβ - (R/2)gαβ = 8πGTαβ, indicating that the original post contained a typo, which was later fixed.
  • A later post asks about the process of finding the Ricci scalar from a given metric and the calculation of the stress-energy tensor, indicating a lack of experience with actual calculations in general relativity.
  • Another participant provides a formula for the Christoffel symbols and explains how to derive the Riemann tensor and subsequently the Ricci tensor and scalar, suggesting the use of computational software for these calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants acknowledge that it is possible to have a curved spacetime without an energy-momentum tensor, as indicated by the example of a Schwarzschild black hole. However, there is no consensus on the implications of the initial participant's calculations, as some express uncertainty about potential mistakes.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include the initial participant's uncertainty regarding their calculations and the assumptions made in deriving the energy-momentum tensor from the metric. There is also a lack of clarity on the steps involved in calculating the Ricci scalar and stress-energy tensor.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or individuals interested in general relativity, particularly those looking to understand the relationship between metrics, curvature, and energy-momentum tensors.

chinared
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I got some trouble from this question:
For a given metric: ds2 =t-2(dx2-dt2), derive the energy-momentum tensor which satisfies the Einstein equation: Rαβ- 1/2Rgαβ=8\piGTαβ.

I got the Ricci scalar R=2, but Tαβ=0 for all α,β. Does this means a curved spacetime without any source(energy-momentum tensor)? Is this possible? Or this result implies that I have made some mistakes in my calculation?

Thanks for answering this question!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A schwarzschild black hole is a curved spacetime with no stress-energy tensor, so yes.
 
A correction to the EFE as you've written them

Rαβ- (R/2)gαβ=8πGTαβ.

I hope it is a typo. (added later ) I see you fixed it after I posted.

Your result is possible as Nabeshin has said.

[edit]
I did the calculation and your results are correct.
 
Last edited:
I've got a question about this problem. I'm not completely new to GR, but I'm new to actual calculations because I've focused mostly on concepts and I haven't taken a GR class.

How can one find the value of the Ricci Scalar from a given metric? And what about the Stress Energy tensor?
 
From the Christoffel symbols,
<br /> {\Gamma ^{m}}_{ab}=\frac{1}{2}g^{mk}(g_{ak,b}+g_{bk,a}-g_{ab,k})<br />
the Riemann tensor follows,
<br /> {R^{r}}_{mqs} = \Gamma ^{r}_{mq,s}-\Gamma ^{r}_{ms,q}+\Gamma ^{r}_{ns}\Gamma ^{n}_{mq}-\Gamma ^{r}_{nq}\Gamma ^{n}_{ms}<br />
from which
<br /> R_{ms}={R^{r}}_{mrs}<br />
and so
<br /> R=g^{ms}R_{ms}<br />

Use Maxima or some other CAS to calculate this stuff - it takes days by hand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
13K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K