A question on Fermi free gas model

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter funginator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermi Gas Model
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Fermi free gas model and the implications of the Pauli Exclusion Principle on fermions in superposition states. It is established that while fermions can exist in superpositions of eigenstates, any wave function that allows for non-zero probability of two fermions occupying the same state is not a valid solution to the Schrödinger equation. The Pauli Exclusion Principle remains applicable, ensuring that fermions must occupy higher energy levels when stacking due to their indistinguishable nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Pauli Exclusion Principle
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation
  • Basic concepts of fermions and their statistical behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Pauli Exclusion Principle on fermionic systems
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of the Schrödinger equation for multi-particle systems
  • Investigate normalization conditions for quantum wave functions
  • Learn about the statistical mechanics of Fermi-Dirac distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, and statistical mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

funginator
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When we are calculating the fermi energy, we say that each energy level is 2 fold degenerate and the fermions stack up into higher and higher energy level due to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. My question is: The Pauli Exclusion principle only says that we can't put different fermions into the same eigenstate, so if we have fermions which are in states of a superposition of different eigenstates with different quantum amplitudes, the fermions do not have to go to higher energy levels because it doesn't contradict the Pauli Exclusion principle anymore?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the exclusion principle is always valid. Say you have two particles which are both in a superposition of two eigenstates. You measure a particle in one state, then the other particle must be in the other state.

Or put it this way: A wave function which is a superposition of several eigenstates for several particles that does not give a zero probability of finding two particles in the same state, simply isn't a valid solution to the Schrödinger equation for fermions.
 
alxm said:
Or put it this way: A wave function which is a superposition of several eigenstates for several particles that does not give a zero probability of finding two particles in the same state, simply isn't a valid solution to the Schrödinger equation for fermions.

I wonder if you mean that it's technically a valid solution of the differential equation but we have to throw it out because it violates the exclusion principle?

For example, if we take the ground state solution of the hydrogen atom and multiply it by any number greater than 1, then the resulting wave function is still a solution of the differential equation. We throw it out because it's not normalized, but it's still a valid solution of the differential equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K