Is Atomic Decay the Universal Standard for Measuring Seconds?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JeffCyr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Decay
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The official definition of a second is based on the vibrations of a cesium-133 atom, specifically 9,192,631,770 transitions between energy levels at absolute zero (0 Kelvin). This atomic decay provides a universal standard for measuring time, making it applicable regardless of location in the universe. The discussion confirms that cesium's decay is indeed the current standard for defining a second, ensuring precision in timekeeping.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic physics, specifically atomic decay.
  • Familiarity with the cesium-133 isotope and its properties.
  • Knowledge of the concept of energy levels in atoms.
  • Basic grasp of time measurement standards and their evolution.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the International System of Units (SI) and its definitions of time.
  • Explore the principles of atomic clocks and their operation.
  • Investigate the implications of using atomic decay for timekeeping in various scientific fields.
  • Learn about other isotopes and their potential for time measurement.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, timekeeping engineers, science fiction writers, and anyone interested in the precise measurement of time and its universal standards.

JeffCyr
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I recall hearing somewhere that the official length of a second was now kept by the measure of how much an atom of a certain material or isotope decays, such as "When X decays by Y it equals one second"

For the novel I'm writing I need a means to measure seconds that would be completely universal no matter where one would be in the universe, so recalling this I figured the decay of some element would be the best way to measure it.

Am I recalling it right that some element's decay is the official measurement of a second? Whether it is or not, is there such an element that could be used for it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, although that's a bit of unknown for me. Does that mean that 1 second is the span of 9 192 631 770 change in energy levels of a cesium atom at 0 kelvin?
 
JeffCyr said:
Thank you, although that's a bit of unknown for me. Does that mean that 1 second is the span of 9 192 631 770 change in energy levels of a cesium atom at 0 kelvin?
Pretty much, yes.
 
Ah thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K