A speck of dust that carries charge in a electric field?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a speck of dust with a mass of 1 x 10-18 kg and a charge equal to that of one electron, situated in a uniform electric field and gravitational field near the Earth's surface. Participants are tasked with interpreting the implications of the charge and its effects in the context of electric fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether the speck can be treated as a point charge and question the implications of its charge being equal to that of an electron. They discuss the nature of the electric field around the speck and the meaning of labeling the charge on the surface.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of the charge and its effects. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of the speck as a point charge and the implications of its negative charge, though there is no explicit consensus on the relevance of induced charge on the Earth's surface.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the confusing wording of the homework problem and express uncertainty about specific terms, such as "the sign of the charge on the surface." There is also mention of the small size of the charge relative to the context of the problem.

Tangeton
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
A speck of dust has a mass of 1 x 10-18 kg and carries a charge equal to that of one electron. Near to the Earth's surface it experiences a uniform downward electric field od strength 100NC-1 and a uniform gravitational field of strength 9.8Nkg-1.

Draw a diagram which shows the electric field pattern and the sign of the charge on the surface.

I find my college's homeworks very confusing in wording and just generally to understand. I can do more stuff with exam Q's most of the time, but these homework bring me out of the safe zone because I can never actually understand what they are trying to say.

First of all, It says the speck of dust itself has a charge, does that mean that I can treat it as a point charge?

Secondly, if it's equal to one electron's charge, does it automatically make the charge negative? The homework sheet says "Electronic Charge = 1.6 x10-19", while the formula booklet says there is a minus before all that so I don't know whether it is a positive charge or a negative charged dust speck.

Thirdly, if it is a point charge, does it mean that it will have its own radial field that, depending on whether it is positive or negative, goes outwards or towards the charge? And that there is going to be a background electric field that is going downwards from most positive to least positive at the same time?

Fourthly, what does it mean by ''the sign of the charge on the surface''? Does it mean that I label the particle negative or positively?

Since this forum requires an attempt at answer:
20h63nm.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tangeton said:
First of all, It says the speck of dust itself has a charge, does that mean that I can treat it as a point charge?
That depends on what you want to calculate. For the sketch, it should not matter (a sphere is easier to draw clearly).
Tangeton said:
Secondly, if it's equal to one electron's charge, does it automatically make the charge negative?
Probably, as an electron has a negative charge.
Tangeton said:
Thirdly, if it is a point charge, does it mean that it will have its own radial field that, depending on whether it is positive or negative, goes outwards or towards the charge?
It will have its own electric field, independent of the size of the speck of dust. You probably don't need this field.
Tangeton said:
Fourthly, what does it mean by ''the sign of the charge on the surface''? Does it mean that I label the particle negative or positively?
Probably, but I don't see the point in this part of the homework question.
 
You should show the E field pointing from the Earth to the speck (quiz: why not from the speck to the earth?). The surface they refer to must be the earth, since it's obvious what the charge on the speck is. The Earth's surface in the immediate vicinity of the speck will have charge induced due to the presence of the speck.

The wording on this problem does indeed leave much to be desired.
 
rude man said:
The surface they refer to must be the earth, since it's obvious what the charge on the speck is.
Ah, good idea.
The Earth's surface in the immediate vicinity of the speck will have charge induced due to the presence of the speck.
I doubt that's relevant, considering the tiny charge of the speck.

Yes, the wording of the problem is problematic.
 
mfb said:
I doubt that's relevant, considering the tiny charge of the speck.
But, it's a tiny problem! The flux lines have to end somewhere, and that somewhere is the earth.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K