so i came up with a proof that..well..(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Let L/K be a field extension and we have defined the norm and trace of an element in L, call it a, to be the determinant (resp. trace) of the linear transformation L -> L given by x->ax. Now it's well known that the determinant and trace are the product/sum of the eigenvalues of a linear transformation. An eigenvalue here would be an element c in K such that for some nonzero x in L we have

f(x)=cx where f(x)=ax which would mean we'd have cx=ax. So c=a, how is this possible if a is NOT in K?

i'm clearly missing something very obvious here because this is nonsense!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A stupid question on norm and trace of fields

Loading...

Similar Threads - stupid question norm | Date |
---|---|

I Question about inverse operators differential operators | Feb 9, 2018 |

I Stupid Question about a Notation in Linear algebra | Apr 25, 2016 |

Isomorphisms between cyclic groups? (stupid question) | Apr 19, 2009 |

Possibly stupid question | Aug 19, 2008 |

Stupid/ simple question about g2 | Nov 14, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**