A Tensor Problem: A skew-symmetric tensor and another tensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter kudoushinichi88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the expression (B_{ij} B_{kl} + B_{il}B_{kj})A_{ik} involving a skew-symmetric tensor A_{ij} and a second-order tensor B_{ij}. The key insight is recognizing the structure of the expression, which resembles the interaction of Levi-Civita symbols and Kronecker deltas. The final simplified form of the expression is 2B_{mj} B_{ml} A_{nn}, where the indices are summed according to Einstein notation. This conclusion is reached by manipulating the indices and factoring appropriately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tensor algebra and operations
  • Familiarity with skew-symmetric tensors and their properties
  • Knowledge of Einstein summation convention
  • Basic concepts of Levi-Civita symbols and Kronecker delta
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of skew-symmetric tensors in depth
  • Learn about the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications in tensor calculus
  • Explore advanced tensor manipulation techniques
  • Investigate the implications of Einstein summation in tensor expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those working with tensor analysis and applications in mechanics or relativity.

kudoushinichi88
Messages
125
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



If A_{ij} is a skew-symmetric tensor, and B_{ij} is a second-order tensor, evaluate the expression

(B_{ij} B_{kl} + B_{il}B_{kj})A_{ik}

and express the final answer in its simplest form.

Homework Equations



For a skew-symmetric tensor, A_{ik}=-A_{ki}


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm stuck and unsure what's the first step. I notice that the expression in the bracket looks similar to what happens when two Levi-Civita symbols come together to form an expression of two pairs of the Kronecker delta. Other than that I'm quite lost. Can I get a tip please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are probably summing over all the repeated indices, right? Remember then that the dummy indices are arbitrary, and you can for example swap k and i if you feel like it. Using this, maybe you can write the expression into a form where you take BijBkl as a common factor, multiplying some expression containing the tensor A.
 
Here's what I have so far:

<br /> (B_{ij} B_{kl} + B_{il}B_{kj})A_{ik}\\<br /> =B_{ij} B_{1l}A_{i1}+B_{ij}B_{2l}A_{i2}+B_{il} B_{1l}A_{i1}+B_{il}B_{2j}A_{i2}\\<br /> =B_{1j} B_{1l}A_{11}+B_{2j} B_{1l}A_{21}+B_{1j}B_{2l}A_{12}+B_{2j}B_{2l}A_{22}+B_{1l} B_{1l}A_{11}+B_{2l} B_{1l}A_{21}+B_{1l}B_{2j}A_{12}+B_{2l}B_{2j}A_{22}\\<br /> =2B_{1j} B_{1l}A_{11}+2B_{2l}B_{2j}A_{22}

So the final answer that I can give is... 2\sum_i B_{ij} B_{il} A_{ii} or in the Einstein summation, 2B_{mj} B_{ml} A_{nn} with nn no sum.

If this is correct, is there any other way to write this without the no sum?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K