Abelian Group Proof: Example to Show Necessity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of abelian groups, specifically examining the statement that if G is an abelian group, then (ab)^2 = a^2b^2 for all elements a, b in G. Participants are tasked with providing an example to demonstrate the necessity of the abelian property in this theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of commutativity in the context of the theorem, questioning how the equality (ab)^2 = a^2b^2 holds true only under the assumption of abelian properties. There are attempts to identify specific examples of non-abelian groups where this equality fails.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and attempting to clarify their understanding of the relationship between abelian properties and the equality in question. Some have suggested that any non-abelian group could serve as a counterexample, while others are trying to find specific instances or examples to illustrate this point.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that matrix groups may serve as examples of non-abelian groups, where the property of commutativity does not hold, thus failing the identity (ab)^2 = a^2b^2. There is an emphasis on the need to prove that the failure of the identity implies non-abelian characteristics.

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If G is an abelian group, then (ab)^2=a^2b^2 for all a, b in G. Give an example to show that abelian is necessary in the statement of the theorem.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Abelian implies commutativity.
a*b=?b*a
a^2b^2=b^2a^2
For example ab=ba must be true for the statement to work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
take for example a^2 b^2 and expand it to aabb

what can you do if ab is abelian?
 
aabb
Implies commutativity so aabb=bbaa
I think there's something with inverse to make this work
 
a(ab)b
 
Ok so a(ab)b and b(ab)a
so this implies ab=ba
 
kathrynag said:
Ok so a(ab)b and b(ab)a
so this implies ab=ba

the definition of abelian is not axb = bxa so can't do that

so instead we can swap the ab
 
I don't really understand. You're saying we can swap the ab, but I don't gte what you mean by this.
(ab)ab=(ab)ba
 
I don't know what what it making you do. The point was to show that you can find G non-abelian where (ab)^2 is not equal to a^2b^2 for some a and b.
 
Yeah and I wanted to prove that abelian implied (ab)^2=a^2b^2
Is there a hint for an a and b to use where the 2 aren't equal?
 
  • #10
(ab)^2 = a^2 b^2 --->

abab = aabb -------->

cancel the leftmost a and the rightmost b:

ba = ab
 
  • #11
well

a^2b^2 = aabb = a(ab)b

because they are abelian ab = ba

so aabb = a(ba)b = (ab)(ab)
 
  • #12
what said:
well

a^2b^2 = aabb = a(ab)b

because they are abelian ab = ba

so aabb = a(ba)b = (ab)(ab)

But you are supposed to prove that they are Abelian.
 
  • #13
Ok I understnd how to prove it now.
I'm having trouble with the example to show abelain is necessary.
 
  • #14
kathrynag said:
Ok I understnd how to prove it now.
I'm having trouble with the example to show abelain is necessary.

It is necessary because:

(ab)^2 = a^2 b^2 --->

abab = aabb -------->

cancel the leftmost a and the rightmost b:

ba = ab

So, we have that

(ab)^2 = a^2 b^2 implies that ab = ba

This is the same as saying:

Not[ab = ba] implies Not[(ab)^2 = a^2 b^2]

Or, in plain English, if you don't have the Abelian property, you don't have that (ab)^2 = a^2 b^2. So, the Abelian property is a necessary assumption for the identity to hold.
 
  • #15
Hmmm, I think I might see this better if I saw a way where it doesn't work. For example (ab)^2 not equaling a^2b^2. Therefore, not abelian
 
  • #16
kathrynag said:
Hmmm, I think I might see this better if I saw a way where it doesn't work. For example (ab)^2 not equaling a^2b^2. Therefore, not abelian

But that's equivalent to Abelian ---> (ab)^2 =a^2b^2

which is the trivial case.

If you know that this is true (so Abelian implies the identity), then should you encounter a case where the identity is not satisfied, you know that the group cannot be Abelian.
 
  • #17
that's what I'm trying to do to find a case now where the identity is not satisfied to show then that the group is not abelian
 
  • #18
Um, as count Iblis has pointed out *any* non-abelian group will provide a counter example.
 
  • #19
kathrynag said:
that's what I'm trying to do to find a case now where the identity is not satisfied to show then that the group is not abelian

You can take some group of matrices. Matrix multiplication does not commute. So, it should be easy to find a particular example where the identity does not hold.

But such a particular example does not show that the fact that the identity does not hold implies that the group is non-abelian. To show that, you need to prove that whenever the identity does not hold, you also have that the group is not abelian.
 
  • #20
Oh, that makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K