About IEEE 802.3ab 1000Base-T TCM encoding

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Trellis Coded Modulation (TCM) used in the 1000BASE-T standard of IEEE 802.3ab Gigabit Ethernet. Participants confirm that this forum is suitable for discussing technical details regarding TCM. A specific question is raised about the nature of the IDLE symbol (000), whether it is a state of the convolutional encoder or a distinct output symbol. Clarification is sought on how IDLE is used when no data is transmitted, emphasizing its role in resetting the convolutional decoder. The conversation aims to enhance understanding of TCM's encoding mechanisms in 1000BASE-T.
cianfa72
Messages
2,784
Reaction score
293
TL;DR Summary
About some clarification on Trellis Coded Modulation (TCM) employed in IEEE 802.3ab 1000BASE-T standard
Hi, I would like to discuss some details about the Trellis Coded Modulation (TCM) used on 1000BASE-T 802.3ab Gigabitethernet IEEE standard.

Is this the right place to do that ? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cianfa72 said:
Is this the right place to do that ?
Yes, it's a good place to start. If needed later, we can move the thread elsewhere.
 
Starting from this link, it isn't clear to me whether IDLE is one of the symbol sent or is actually a state of the Convolutional encoder employed in 1000BASE-T.

Ethernet_and_PHY-Trellis_2.drawio.png


The above picture from that link shows a 2-stage Trellis of the Convolutional encoder where the triplets in blue circles are the states and each of the arcs/edges represents an encoder's output symbol for a specific binary input (i.e. this encoder has 8 states and 2 binary inputs).

My question is: what is IDLE (000) ? Is it a state or is it a specific output symbol ? The doubt arises from the following statement:
When there is no data, IDLE (000) is sent. To make IDLE easily detectable, it has its own symbol, and the convolutional decoder is reset on IDLE.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top